On Thursday, 10 de February de 2011 00:25:12 Olivier Goffart wrote:
Q_GLOBAL_STATIC is not public API. Don't use it.
Would it be an option to make it public API by documenting it or is that
out of the question?
I'm in favor of making it public API.
Even if that is the case, KDE
Em quinta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2011, às 10:49:08, Stefan Majewsky
escreveu:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote:
The correct way to solve this problem is to show another window
indicating that it is doing something and tell me what. We solve both
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:31, Johannes Sixt j.s...@viscovery.net wrote:
Am 2/10/2011 10:40, schrieb Ben Cooksley:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Johannes Sixt j.s...@viscovery.net wrote:
git push origin KDE/4.6
This is wrong, as it would try to push the content of HEAD (the merge
of
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:43, Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote:
Em quinta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2011, às 10:49:08, Stefan Majewsky
escreveu:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote:
The correct way to solve this problem is to show another window
Em quinta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2011, às 09:04:09, Ian Monroe escreveu:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:43, Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote:
Em quinta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2011, às 10:49:08, Stefan Majewsky
escreveu:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org
On 02/10/2011 09:04 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Even if that is the case, KDE should use K_GLOBAL_STATIC, which is better than
Q_GLOBAL_STATIC.
I don't know why is better (I haven't check the code) but then, maybe we
can add a new public macro to Qt with the goodness of K_GLOBAL_STATIC
and
On Thursday, 10 de February de 2011 19:57:42 Alex Fiestas wrote:
On 02/10/2011 09:04 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Even if that is the case, KDE should use K_GLOBAL_STATIC, which is
better than Q_GLOBAL_STATIC.
I don't know why is better (I haven't check the code) but then, maybe we
can add
Thiago Macieira wrote:
It should have been in a qglobalstatic_p.h. We might even do that -- and
intentionally break applications that are abusing the API.
A quick grep says that would break akonadi, grantlee, qca, phonon, qxt and a
couple of places in KDE that use it already (presumably
Thiago Macieira wrote:
Well, first of all, Thiago is not the highest authority in Qt. You just
had my opinion, not of all people.
Sure. I'd call a 'no' from any troll a veto. The only repsonse I got was a
no on #qt-labs. That's the only way I have of reaching 'all people' until
open
On Thursday 10 February 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Thiago Macieira wrote:
If the user can't get any kind of feedback, the application
shouldn't be running anymore.
System tray icons are a kind of feedback.
Again, I might be missing something here.
Does a systray icon already count
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 16:35:20 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday, 10 de February de 2011 21:08:05 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Thiago Macieira wrote:
It should have been in a qglobalstatic_p.h. We might even do that --
and intentionally break applications that are
On Thursday, 10 de February de 2011 17:11:42 Michael Pyne wrote:
I say this as someone who uses QAtomicInt assuming a mode of operation that
is not explicitly documented (i.e. it is safe to initialize its memory
with 0 and avoid running the ctor). If Nokia changes it I would grumble,
but it
12 matches
Mail list logo
