---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101552/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps.
Summary
---
Attached patch prevents
A Wednesday, June 08, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
> On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 19:48:30 Mark wrote:
> > Just a comment that might be of interest to some (just found this link):
> > http://code.google.com/p/simple-gettext/
> > It also has a Qt wrapper..
>
> Interesting, but not very active, GPL3 so
Would asking for client certficate authentication support be out of
the scope or does Qt's SSL already support that ? Last I checked it
did not and there is a pending but report about this against kio_http.
See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167668.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Richard Mo
Hi All,
Right now, we have the opportunity to make sure that Qt's SSL classes
offer us the facilities we need in KDE. I'll be attending the QCS and
will most likely be working on the SSL stack at the time. If anyone
knows anything that we need in KDE that's not currently offered (or
even more impo
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2011 19:48:30 Mark wrote:
> Just a comment that might be of interest to some (just found this link):
> http://code.google.com/p/simple-gettext/
> It also has a Qt wrapper..
Interesting, but not very active, GPL3 so not something that could be used in
library code, and lacking
On Tuesday 07 Jun 2011 18:57:22 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
> > We discussed translation briefly at Platform 11 and Qt moving to or
> > supporting .po is something we really want to push for at QCS. I really
> > hope we have some people knowledgable
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, John Layt va escriure:
>
> > We discussed translation briefly at Platform 11 and Qt moving to or
>
> > supporting .po is something we really want to push for at QCS. I really
>
> > hope we have some people knowl
As you already know, we have discussed the git workflow for KDE at the
Platform 11 sprint, and have come up with a recommendation. Please find the
full text here: http://community.kde.org/KDE_Core/Platform_11/Git_Workflow
The core ideas are that:
* master is always kept in a stable state that is
On Monday 06 June 2011, David Faure wrote:
> About the second question, here's my commit log for 60ae8626e917cb1f3:
>
> Re-route the old actions "Find Text as You Type" and "Find Links as You
> Type" to the findbar. Remove them from the menu, since they are redundant
> with "Find text", but ke
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101491/#review3775
---
This review has been submitted with commit
ce405591dde09c3462c2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101491/#review3776
---
This review has been submitted with commit
18a232984b8414795aab
> On June 6, 2011, 2:10 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Looks good. Do you want me to commit this for you, or do you want to get a
> > kde contributor account instead, to be able to commit this directly as well
> > as future patches? :)
>
> Lukas Sommer wrote:
> It would be great to have a kd
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Simon Persson wrote:
>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101523/
>
> On June 7th, 2011, 4:31 p.m., *Michael Jansen* wrote:
>
> Looks good but i am wondering if it wouldn't be necessary to complain about
On Thursday 26 May 2011, Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 21:58:13 Marco Martin wrote:
> > just a reminder on this:
> > do we all agree it's a blocker?
>
> I would agree it's a blocker, kdelibs should not depend on KDE libraries
> which don't also have a stable ABI.
>
> > and that
On Sunday 08 May 2011, Dawit A wrote:
> In hopes of making Konqueror's default settings for the aforementioned
> HTTP headers inline with other browsers, I want to change the default
> settings for these three header as outlined below.
>
> ** Please note that this only affects the default! Each an
> On June 7, 2011, 4:28 p.m., Michael Jansen wrote:
> > Why don't you fix KKeyServer to return the correct results instead of
> > fixing the wrong ones here?
Yes, my first thought was to fix this by changing KKeyServer::keyQtToModX to
add Shift to the modifiers if it is needed to get the symbo
> On June 7, 2011, 4:31 p.m., Michael Jansen wrote:
> > Looks good but i am wondering if it wouldn't be necessary to complain about
> > a shortcut conflict if you try to register some shortcut with tab and the
> > same one with backtab is already registered? If not we could get two
> > conflic
> On June 6, 2011, 2:10 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Looks good. Do you want me to commit this for you, or do you want to get a
> > kde contributor account instead, to be able to commit this directly as well
> > as future patches? :)
It would be great to have a kde contributor account. (Howeve
On 06/07/2011 01:41 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 de June de 2011 10:14:43 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 08:21:02 AM Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>>> Just as a side-note on SDO: For me SDO is very close to the KDE
>>> development process. If I had my way everyone runn
19 matches
Mail list logo
