---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102822/
---
Review request for kdelibs, Andreas Hartmetz and Dawit Alemayehu.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 14:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
I want to request a security audit for the changes to ensure that the new
implementation is as secure as the existing one and that I did not forget an
important case which would compromise the security.
The general concept of the new
Testing
---
-Patched code compiles
-Hacked a web server and made tests against following keep-alive header
variants:
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=99
Keep-Alive: Timeout=5, max=99 (uppercase 'T')
Keep-Alive: Timeout=5 , max=99(extra space before comma)
I don't know which RfC
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15:33:39 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 14.55.29 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Monday 10 October 2011 20:02:07 Parker Coates wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 14:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
I want to request a security audit for the changes to ensure that
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
password unlock? If so why is that not a vaild usecase? It's what I
use at home all the time.
Why that?
xdpms saves you power (and screen, if that would be
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:06:11 Andras Mantia wrote:
From here:
If KWin crashes without restarting privacy is leaked but the system is
hardly useable due to missing window manager. This situation can savely
be ignored as a corner case as KWin normaly restart.
This is not true, the
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:33:39 you wrote:
Once the screen locker crashes, security must be assumed
broken (if only by visual access).
Therefore the locker must not crash
full ack, we have to be at 0 crashes in KWin (which has to be our goal for
Wayland anyway ;-)
and if it does,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:55:15PM +0200, Thomas Lübking wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200 schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
password unlock? If so why is that not a vaild usecase? It's what I
use at home all the
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:00:46 +0200
schrieb Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org:
that is a good suggestion. I will think about how I can add that.
Though if someone breaks by crashing kwin he is also able to remove
any log. So this could be just snakeoil.
He'll be able to click away the message,
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 17:47:13 you wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:00:46 +0200
schrieb Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org:
that is a good suggestion. I will think about how I can add that.
Though if someone breaks by crashing kwin he is also able to remove
any log. So this could be just
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 16:33:39 Thomas L�bking wrote:
Also it's not required to have the terminal on top of the stack - i've
always been very successful abusing MMB cp to clickpaste me any
command i wanted ;-)
Seems I'm not alone doing that. :)
Andras
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:34:10 +0200
schrieb Oswald Buddenhagen o...@kde.org:
because it's pretty?
Sink me, I say! -- Blakeney, Wooster - and it's even a poem
I however prefer to be present when the pretties show up (see att.)
Cheers,
Thomas
matrix
Description: Binary data
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 17:34:10 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:55:15PM +0200, Thomas Lübking wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200 schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
password unlock? If so why
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15.55.15 you wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
password unlock? If so why is that not a vaild usecase? It's what I
use at home all the time.
Why
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:02:32 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15.55.15 you wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
password unlock? If so why is that not a
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 19.52.36 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:02:32 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15.55.15 you wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Does this mean that I will be focred to use a
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:02:32 +0200
schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Screensaver is bling only
No, screensaver hacks are bling only, a screensaver is a
software relic.
The key aspect is when and why is there eye-candy.
You can still run all scsreensavers to look at them, they're just
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:06:11 Andras Mantia wrote:
From here:
If KWin crashes without restarting privacy is leaked but the system is
hardly useable due to missing window manager. This situation can savely
be ignored as a corner case
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 21:06:13 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:06:11 Andras Mantia wrote:
From here:
If KWin crashes without restarting privacy is leaked but the system is
hardly useable due to missing
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:06:13 +0200
schrieb Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org:
You can also switch to a text-mode console (Ctrl+F1 etc), set
DISPLAY, and start the window manager there.
Errr... no.
In case there's an open VT and chvt is permitted, it's
completely pointless to lock the screen,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 16:06:11 Andras Mantia wrote:
From here:
If KWin crashes without restarting privacy is leaked but the system is
hardly useable due to
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Thomas Lübking wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
schrieb Torgny Nyblom nyb...@kde.org:
Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
password unlock? If so why is that not a vaild usecase? It's what I
use at home all the time.
Why
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:42:10 +0200
schrieb Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org:
Until recently I used to believe this. Unfortunately, it's not true.
At work we have several (well, at least two) TFTs which have the line
edit of the login screen burned in. It's clearly visible before a
dark gray
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 20:54:42 Thomas Lübking wrote:
BUT: running them automatically because you're away and the system is
idle is simply not a justifiable (anymore)
With all due respect, and with full agreement that screen savers are not in
general required to *protect the screen*...
Hello,
As KSecretsService becomes quite usable, I think it's time to prepare to
get it integrated into the next release.
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.8_Release_Schedule
The code is not yet fully mature, all the components are not yet
finished, but the main parts are there and it
On 11 October 2011 18:24, Valentin Rusu k...@rusu.info wrote:
Hello,
As KSecretsService becomes quite usable, I think it's time to prepare to get
it integrated into the next release.
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.8_Release_Schedule
The code is not yet fully mature, all the
On 10/12/2011 12:53 AM, Steven Sroka wrote:
The code is not yet fully mature, all the components are not yet finished,
but the main parts are there and it is now possible to have secrets stored
in KSecretsService and konqi or microblog successfully getting them upon
session start. There is a
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:47:52 -0400
schrieb Michael Pyne mp...@kde.org:
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 20:54:42 Thomas Lübking wrote:
BUT: running them automatically because you're away and the system
is idle is simply not a justifiable (anymore)
With all due respect, and with full agreement
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 02:12:55 Thomas Lübking wrote:
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:47:52 -0400 schrieb Michael Pyne mp...@kde.org:
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 20:54:42 Thomas Lübking wrote:
BUT: running them automatically because you're away and the system
is idle is simply not a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102822/#review7251
---
kioslave/http/http.cpp
30 matches
Mail list logo
