On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this list,
there is a frameworks mailing list at kde-frameworks-devel
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
So why have this discussion on a separate list,
A Dimecres, 16 de novembre de 2011, Thomas Friedrichsmeier vàreu escriure:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this list,
there is a frameworks mailing list at kde-frameworks-devel
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 09:48:15 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
So why have this discussion on a separate list, at all? Isn't that
just the� sort of topic that kde-core-devel is for?
I agree...
Andras
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103148/#review8232
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 16:28:21 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:08 PM, Thomas L�bking wrote:
If one wants a feature in future KDE versions and such fork wouldn't
exist, one would not add it at all rather than to the frameworks?
Doesn't make any sense to me, sorry.
That's
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Andras Mantia wrote:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 09:48:15 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
So why have this discussion on a separate list, at all? Isn't that
just the� sort of topic that kde-core-devel is for?
I agree...
Andras
+1
Alex
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
the best way to deal with it is not to consider it a fork of kdelibs but
the next version of kdelibs (that's what it is) and help out with it :)
another way of putting is: please don't fighting your own teammates (the
Hello,
Probably I've missed something, or what I propose is unpractical (or too
late), but here I go, anyway:
If the frameworks branch still depends on Qt 4,
Is it possible to have a public version of it once the
refactoring has been completed, but before it depends on Qt 5?
It could be used as a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103160/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
Several small fixes to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103160/
---
(Updated Nov. 16, 2011, 8:55 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
On 11/16/2011 11:31 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 16:28:21 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:08 PM, Thomas L�bking wrote:
If one wants a feature in future KDE versions and such fork wouldn't
exist, one would not add it at all rather than to the frameworks?
On 17.11.11 00:14:23, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On 11/16/2011 11:31 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 16:28:21 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:08 PM, Thomas L�bking wrote:
If one wants a feature in future KDE versions and such fork wouldn't
exist, one would
12 matches
Mail list logo
