KDE mailing lists - a few questions

2012-05-22 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
Hi everyone, a quality discussion on IRC this morning triggered a few question I think are best addressed to this list. 1. I don't question that KDE has several groups that need a mailing list with a private archive, only accessible to subscribers, but what is the reason to make mailing lists

Re: KDE mailing lists - a few questions

2012-05-22 Thread todd rme
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Myriam Schweingruber myr...@kde.org wrote: Hi everyone, a  quality discussion on IRC this morning triggered a few question I think are best addressed to this list. 1. I don't question that KDE has several groups that need a mailing list with a private

Re: KDE mailing lists - a few questions

2012-05-22 Thread Martin Klapetek
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:54 AM, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote: Another issue: are mailing lists the proper way to be distributing bugzilla notifications, or should those be handled by subscriptions inside bugzilla? From the discussions I have seen the latter is supposed to be the

Re: KDE mailing lists - a few questions

2012-05-22 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
Hi Todd, On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:54 AM, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Myriam Schweingruber myr...@kde.org wrote: Hi everyone, What is the criteria for a mailing list being dead? No mails since several months. Also the sysadmins see those easily as

Review Request: Apper on kdereview

2012-05-22 Thread Daniel Nicoletti
Hi, Apper is on playground probably since 2008, it's widely used nowadays so it doesn't make sense to keep it there anymore. So please review the code, make suggestions and such... Right now the code is at (I've asked kde sysadmin to move to kdereview, but afaik it will only reflect the projects

Re: Review Request: Apper on kdereview

2012-05-22 Thread Laszlo Papp
Right now the code is at (I've asked kde sysadmin to move to kdereview, but afaik it will only reflect the projects url): https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/sysadmin/apper/repository Yes, the repository can be found here while reviewing:

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-22 Thread Vishesh Handa
Does anyone have suggestions on where nepomuk-kde-kio and nepomuk-kde-config should be placed? I was thinking under kde-baseaps, but that might not be correct. Any suggestions? On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org wrote: On Thursday, 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote:

Re: Review Request: Apper on kdereview

2012-05-22 Thread Daniel Nicoletti
Extragear, as I depend on PackageKit releases this would be more flexible for me :) Best, 2012/5/22 Anne-Marie Mahfouf annemarie.mahf...@free.fr: On 05/21/2012 11:31 PM, Daniel Nicoletti wrote: Hi, Apper is on playground probably since 2008, it's widely used nowadays so it doesn't make

Re: Review Request: Apper on kdereview

2012-05-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 21 de maig de 2012, a les 18:31:25, Daniel Nicoletti va escriure: Hi, Apper is on playground probably since 2008, it's widely used nowadays so it doesn't make sense to keep it there anymore. So please review the code, make suggestions and such... AppSetup doesn't seem to be

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-22 Thread Vishesh Handa
Sebastian Change of plans. As per recent discussions with tsdgeos and kde_pepo on #kde-devel - They would like to avoid too many new repositories. So, if it's okay with you we'll keep the nepomuk-kde-config and nepomuk-kde-kio code in kde-runtime, while the rest can be removed as it is there in