On 06/06/2012 03:19 AM, Dawit A wrote:
It is a simple matter to put a #ifdef around the code that does not
compile with Qt 4.7. I wish this issue was raised when the code was up
for review for more than a month or the Qt documentation mentioned
something about those functions only being
On 6 June 2012 02:19, Dawit A ada...@kde.org wrote:
It is a simple matter to put a #ifdef around the code that does not compile
with Qt 4.7. I wish this issue was raised when the code was up for review
for more than a month or the Qt documentation mentioned something about
those functions only
On Monday, June 04, 2012 10:07:45 PM Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
So May was beautiful, so much that I almost forgot to send now my
traditional what happens in the kdelibs splitting email. That's what you
get for spacing out in the garden I guess... :-)
# May results
So you're probably
On Tuesday 05 June 2012 00:15:19 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Monday, June 04, 2012 10:07:45 PM Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
So May was beautiful, so much that I almost forgot to send now my
traditional what happens in the kdelibs splitting email. That's what you
get for spacing out in
To re-iterate, it is policy that any dependency changes are discussed
and approved on k-c-d first.
It was discussed and disapproved as far as I understood.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On May 19, Dawit Alemayehu commited a change that uses
QSslConfiguration::testSslOption that is only available in Qt 4.8
This means that both kdelibs 4.8.4 and kdelibs 4.9 now depend in Qt 4.8
instead Qt 4.7
Hi Albert,
thanks for
Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On May 19, Dawit Alemayehu commited a change that uses
QSslConfiguration::testSslOption that is only available in Qt 4.8
This means that both kdelibs 4.8.4 and kdelibs 4.9 now depend in Qt 4.8
instead Qt 4.7
Hi
On Wednesday, June 06, 2012 10:07:41 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
...
We completed the following three new frameworks:
* karchive
I wouldn't call karchive complete.
It is not splitted.
E.g. it uses include dirs from the surrounding kdelibs:
include_directories(
El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 11:26:32, Laszlo Papp va escriure:
To re-iterate, it is policy that any dependency changes are discussed
and approved on k-c-d first.
It was discussed and disapproved as far as I understood.
Do you have a link for that discussion?
Albert
Best
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Ah, right.
Can you put a copy of FindLibLZMA.cmake into tier1/karchive/cmake/ ?
(it will be in cmake 2.8.9)
Then we don't need the CMAKE_MODULE_PATH from kdelibs anymore, and
karchive is more standalone.
Or we can bump the dependency to 2.8.9 when the RC 1 comes
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 15:59:16 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Can you put a copy of FindLibLZMA.cmake into tier1/karchive/cmake/ ?
Done.
(it will be in cmake 2.8.9)
That's why I didn't put it initially.
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud patron of KDE,
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 20:23:48, Laszlo Papp va escriure:
Do you have a link for that discussion?
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=132630064116231w=2
That was in January though, people change
El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 15:53:36, Dawit A va escriure:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimecres, 6 de juny de 2012, a les 20:23:48, Laszlo Papp va escriure:
Do you have a link for that discussion?
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 20:32:49 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
But I'm expecting more people to have an opinion on this. David? Sebas?
Someone from plasma?
in the initial thread I was in favor of going for Qt 4.8, but I accepted the
opinion of the majority. I would consider it as a bad incident if
14 matches
Mail list logo
