Yes, I'm obviously trying.
My first attempt was a tiny change in the KCookieServer/KCookieJar API to
let people search just for persistent cookies.
But it failed.
I'm currently working on a second attempt following the same approach. If
not, I though about implementing a different jar for the priva
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:37:59, Alexander Neundorf va
escriure:
> On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
> > >
> > > Alex
> >
> > I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
> On Dec. 17, 2012, 10:38 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > IMHO this is wrong.
> > Not code wise but conceptual. As far as I understand QSettings is basically
> > deprecated, it is just not official marked as such because there is no
> > replacement. This would be porting away from a fully functi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107791/#review23643
---
IMHO this is wrong.
Not code wise but conceptual. As far as I u
Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2012, 23:11:14 schrieb David Faure:
> [How many lists do I need to read this thread on? Cutting the cross-posting
> off]
>
> On Monday 17 December 2012 17:46:51 Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > PS.: If only the entry barrier was not so high for even a basic tool like
> > cmake. It is
[How many lists do I need to read this thread on? Cutting the cross-posting
off]
On Monday 17 December 2012 17:46:51 Laszlo Papp wrote:
> PS.: If only the entry barrier was not so high for even a basic tool like
> cmake. It is certainly not a problem for me as an arch user, but I can
> understand
On Sunday 16 December 2012 18:41:31 andrea diamantini wrote:
> - New private browsing mode (NOT based on KIO, as it seems our cookiejar is
> not enough "malleable" for it. At least in kde4)
Are you working on patches to make it "malleable" enough in the future?
If you need something, make it happ
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107791/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2012, 9:15 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, kdel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107791/
---
Review request for kdelibs and David Faure.
Description
---
Ported ev
On Monday 17 December 2012, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Alexander Neundorf ha scritto:
> > On Monday 17 December 2012, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
> > > > Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107412/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2012, 8:05 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs and David Fa
Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Alexander Neundorf ha scritto:
> On Monday 17 December 2012, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
> > > Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds
> > > of kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent chan
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of
> kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs.
> These changes are a port from Nepomuk (part of kdelibs) to NepomukCore
> (a seperate repository).
On Monday 17 December 2012, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
> > On Monday 17 December 2012, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of
> >> kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to r
On Monday 17 December 2012, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
> > Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of
> > kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs.
> > These changes are a port from Nepomuk (part of
Alle lunedì 17 dicembre 2012, Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
> Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of
> kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs.
> These changes are a port from Nepomuk (part of kdelibs) to
> NepomukCore (a seperate repository).
>
>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 17 December 2012, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of
>> kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs.
>> These changes are a port from
On Monday 17 December 2012, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of
> kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs.
> These changes are a port from Nepomuk (part of kdelibs) to NepomukCore
> (a seperate repository)
Hi all,
Currently build.kde.org is unable to successfully complete builds of
kdeplasma-addons and Calligra due to recent changes in kdepimlibs.
These changes are a port from Nepomuk (part of kdelibs) to NepomukCore
(a seperate repository).
As kdepimlibs uses the *Config.cmake method of exporting
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107775/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime and George Kiagiadakis.
Description
---
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Not really. For the frameworks branch the most current cmake is required,
> which is 2.8.10.1 currently.
> We will stay there with the most current until we get somewhat stable.
>
I see.
My post seems to date back then when it was disc
On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
> >
> > Alex
>
> I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
> With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch
> needed.
The attached pat
On Monday 17 December 2012, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va
> >
> > escriure:
> > > Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antoni
Now that all modules have a KDE/4.10 branch, kdelibs can use again the same
workflow as the other modules: 4.10 for the 4.10.x series, and master for the
4.11.x series. This will create less confusion than a frozen master and a
different branching date.
However, kdelibs master is STILL feature
Hello,
> Attached, can somebody give it a try ?
>
> Alex
>
I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.
With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch
needed.
Regards,
Antonis
25 matches
Mail list logo
