On Jan. 20, 2013, 11:53 a.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
File Attachment: Icon Dialog with 200dpi
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/#fcomment5
Why is that icon smaller than the others? Is it because the bigger
version of it does not exist?
Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
Also
On Jan. 20, 2013, 2:40 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp, line 141
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/2/?file=108215#file108215line141
Would it for such static sizes (why 60px in the first place?) not be
more correct to use sh. like
On Jan. 20, 2013, 2:40 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
kio/kfile/kicondialog.cpp, line 141
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108504/diff/2/?file=108215#file108215line141
Would it for such static sizes (why 60px in the first place?) not be
more correct to use sh. like
Hi,
A couple of months ago I attended the Linux Color Management Hackfest mainly
to find out how to color manage printing, but also to get a wider overview,
and to figure out the colord versus Oyranos situation. I've been sitting on
this email for a bit as it's probably going to be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108539/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
kjs: Implement
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108538/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
kjs: Remove leftover
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106671/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104243/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105631/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105430/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105386/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104630/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104798/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104515/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104747/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104748/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104629/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:11 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104749/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:12 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104746/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:12 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104629/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 3:47 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
On Monday 21 January 2013 21:22:42 John Layt wrote:
Thoughts?
thanks John for the long and well elaborated mail. It helped me understanding
the porblem better.
From what you describe the supposed plugin based approach looks sane to me.
Having a D-Bus interface and a runtime dependency is the
21 matches
Mail list logo