On Sept. 3, 2013, 10:20 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
given that there is no intention to make further feature releases of the
kde workspace which will include kdm, i wonder why we'd go through the
(potentially tedious) process of upstreaming this now?
Stefan Brüns wrote:
The
On Sept. 4, 2013, 8:25 p.m., Eugene Shalygin wrote:
I'm thankfull to all of you for lloking into this! Now I do not know what
to do with these changes. If there will bee no new kdelibs 4.x releases,
how these changes can be released? Will it happen only with Frameworks 5?
Frank
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112529/#review39456
---
kioslave/smb/kio_smb_browse.cpp
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
Hi all,
Hi everyone,
Due to likely disk issues on one of our servers, it is necessary to
replace both disks which the system uses. To ensure data integrity is
maintained, we will begin moving data off the system now,
Hi Ben,
On Friday, September 06, 2013 23:24:34 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Apologies for the inconvenience.
Thanks for your (and the rest of the sysadmin team's) continuous efforts to
keep our infrastructure going, so that we can be productive.
It's much appreciated!
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org |
Dear KDE developers,
as part of expanding the speech-related efforts in KDE, I would like to
propose a new category in KDE's extragear called Speech (putting it on
the same level as e.g., Network). Rationale: Not all speech
recognition applications are necessarily related to accessibility (e.g.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112529/
---
(Updated Sept. 6, 2013, 12:35 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime.
On Sept. 6, 2013, 11:04 a.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
kioslave/smb/kio_smb_browse.cpp, lines 348-354
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112529/diff/1/?file=187202#file187202line348
This - while most was there already - seems odd to me. Your other code
catches IPC$, ADMIN$, printer$ and
Hey Howard,
Thanks for the excellent article published yesterday!
On Friday, September 06, 2013 20:20:24 Ho Wan Chan wrote:
We at the KDE Promotion Team are working on an article to explain the
benefits of KDE Frameworks 5 (which is different from the Dot article we
posted yesterday, that is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112529/#review39461
---
kioslave/smb/kio_smb_browse.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112556/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
In
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112529/
---
(Updated Sept. 6, 2013, 1:04 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112529/#review39462
---
as far as i can judge it, it looks OK to me. Someone else
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/#review39463
---
I have several changes coming to this ioslave. Mainly I am
On Friday 06 September 2013 14:39:07 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hey Howard,
Thanks for the excellent article published yesterday!
On Friday, September 06, 2013 20:20:24 Ho Wan Chan wrote:
We at the KDE Promotion Team are working on an article to explain the
benefits of KDE Frameworks 5
On Sept. 6, 2013, 1:10 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
I have several changes coming to this ioslave. Mainly I am going to
implement the copyFrom and copyTo optimizations like I did for the sftp
ioslave and add support for upload/download resumptions. The changes are
going to come in
On Sep 6, 2013 8:22 AM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Friday, September 06, 2013 23:24:34 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Apologies for the inconvenience.
Thanks for your (and the rest of the sysadmin team's) continuous efforts
to
keep our infrastructure going, so that we can be
Am Freitag 06 September 2013, 12.03:39 schrieb Peter Grasch:
Dear KDE developers,
Morning Peter
as part of expanding the speech-related efforts in KDE, I would like to
propose a new category in KDE's extragear called Speech (putting it on
the same level as e.g., Network). Rationale: Not all
Hi,
I have a review request for Gwenview which I would like to get included in
4.11.2, but Gwenview does not have a very big developer community so I am
afraid it won't get reviewed in time: it already missed the 4.11.1 deadline
and I had to ask for a revert of the kdelibs patch mentioned in
19 matches
Mail list logo
