El Dissabte, 2 de novembre de 2013, a les 19:48:01, Richard Hughes va
escriure:
On 2 November 2013 19:33, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
What's the point in having an installer that hides more than half of the
apps in the world that don't ship a file that is not a standard and
On 3 Nov 2013 11:59, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
I've never created a standard so I can't comment on how to do it
properly, but
writing it and then threatening to exclude from package managers those
that
don't adopt it doesn't seem to be a way to start a discussion to me
This is
El Diumenge, 3 de novembre de 2013, a les 12:22:52, Richard Hughes va
escriure:
On 3 Nov 2013 11:59, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
I've never created a standard so I can't comment on how to do it
properly, but
writing it and then threatening to exclude from package managers
On 3 November 2013 12:32, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
I am all for listing high quality applications, it's just that this just
doesn't help.
Sure it does. We're not going to get AppData files for sodipodi,
cinepaint or arora any time soon. I don't think _having_ an AppData
file makes
On Sunday 03 November 2013 12:22:52 Richard Hughes wrote:
This is what we've decided to do in GNOME, KDE is free to decide any policy
it wants. We've decided that 500 high quality applications are better than
3000 broken ones.
Assuming KDE did that, then we would end up with a situation where
On 3 November 2013 13:30, Sven Brauch svenbra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Assuming KDE did that, then we would end up with a situation where you can't
easily install Krita in distributions that ship GNOME, and you can't easily
install Inkscape in distributions that ship KDE.
I don't think that's
On Saturday, November 02, 2013 08:35:13 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dissabte, 2 de novembre de 2013, a les 12:59:00, Allen Winter va escriure:
On Saturday, November 02, 2013 12:15:15 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi, yesterday i was talking with someone about the desktop file class we
Richard, do you realize how you sound like?
Nice application you have there, would be a shame if something would...
happen to it.
Imho it's a matter of respect to discuss a standard beforehand with a
community. And this threat to exclude apps, well...
Also, using this as a sign of quality is
The whole discussion of whether gnome excludes apps without app-data
will improve the quality of those listed is sort of a moot topic.
We could do with this having this sort of metadata available for all KDE apps;
and in fact we already maintain this sort of data to build the pages
at
On Sunday 03 November 2013 13:50:05 Richard Hughes wrote:
I don't think that's true at all. Krita and Inkscape are two of the
killer apps I'd love to feature more prominently in GNOME Software.
Yes, and of course both applications would do anything it takes to get listed
in the package
On 3 November 2013 14:04, Felix Rohrbach f...@gmx.de wrote:
Nice application you have there, would be a shame if something would...
happen to it.
Not at all. If something as important as Krita didn't ship an AppData
file in Fedora 22, we'd just write one ourselves and put it in the
Fedora srpm
On Sunday 03 November 2013 15:09:13 David Edmundson wrote:
That means we get Gnome app centre support, and if Muon want to use
that spec - that'd be great too.
As far as I know Muon-packagekit is already using it (ot it s planned at
least).
Spec comments:
- The spec says to link to a .desktop file for the application.
This is typically installed with the application (or it is in KDE apps
anyway), I'm confused as to how this is intended to work.
- I would include project icon and project license in the file format.
Maybe this is
El Diumenge, 3 de novembre de 2013, a les 13:24:40, Richard Hughes va
escriure:
On 3 November 2013 12:32, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
I am all for listing high quality applications, it's just that this just
doesn't help.
Sure it does. We're not going to get AppData files for
Attached is an appdata xml file for every kde project.
http://static.davidedmundson.co.uk/kde_appdata.zip (note, I have not
tested these in anything)
and the script to generate it
http://static.davidedmundson.co.uk/appdata_generator.txt
(requires an svn checkout
On Sonntag, 3. November 2013 16:28:56 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 3 de novembre de 2013, a les 13:24:40, Richard Hughes va
escriure:
On 3 November 2013 12:32, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
I am all for listing high quality applications, it's just
that this just
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113591/
---
Review request for kdelibs and David Faure.
Repository: kdelibs
On Oct. 31, 2013, 2:41 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
I see now that I have tried to put too much stuff into a single patch -
it's too hard to digest and to understand, and the number of possibilities
to modify different aspects of UDSEntry in a different way is just too
large for me
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113355/
---
(Updated Nov. 3, 2013, 7 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On 3 November 2013 17:15, Thomas Lübking thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
I think everyone who read this thread was immediately aware that the high
quality applications argument is flawed (i've actually another term in
mind)
Sure, that might be true, but that's not what I was originally trying
2013/11/3 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com:
On 3 November 2013 17:15, Thomas Lübking thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
* does it presently qualify as standard at all? (not as long as it states
particular tools - like gnome i18n, as claimed by David)
Well, it's my standard, and I'm happy to
Matthias Klumpp wrote:
The current
AppStream library uses GObject/GLib, which can be used without
problems from any Qt app
this one? https://gitorious.org/appstream/
Are there any formal releases/tarballs? (I'm having trouble finding any)
It appears apper needs this to enable appstream
Rex Dieter wrote:
Matthias Klumpp wrote:
The current
AppStream library uses GObject/GLib, which can be used without
problems from any Qt app
this one? https://gitorious.org/appstream/
Are there any formal releases/tarballs? (I'm having trouble finding any)
My googling failed me,
23 matches
Mail list logo
