---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114219/#review44926
---
Ship it!
Yes, clearly correct.
For your question about
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114201/#review44927
---
Ship it!
kio/kcmodule.desktop
On Thursday 28 November 2013, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Any thoughts?
In an ideal world we would convince the distros to enable Qt namespace on Qt5,
so that Qt4 and Qt5 symbols does not clash, and does not cause crashes when
loaded as plugins etc.
`Allan
On Dec. 1, 2013, 3:47 a.m., David Faure wrote:
Yes, clearly correct.
For your question about branches: commit in the stable branch and merge
upwards (or ask the module maintainers to merge upwards).
Thank you for the review.
I don't have a git account yet (will apply soon) so could
Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
On Thursday 28 November 2013, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Any thoughts?
In an ideal world we would convince the distros to enable Qt namespace on
Qt5, so that Qt4 and Qt5 symbols does not clash, and does not cause
crashes when loaded as plugins etc.
Sounds
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112463/
---
(Updated Dec. 1, 2013, 9:32 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime and KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114219/#review44972
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114219/
---
(Updated Dec. 2, 2013, 7:27 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been