Pushing AppStream upstream metadata to KDE repositories...?

2014-05-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi there! I asked this a week ago, but just got individual replies from two people who didn't want changes made to their Git master branches currently (not an issue, we handled that via pull-requests and reviewboard). So I wrote this follow-up, which might be a bit more visible ;-) Now that we

Re: Pushing AppStream upstream metadata to KDE repositories...?

2014-05-10 Thread Luigi Toscano
Matthias Klumpp ha scritto: Therefore, I would like to ask for feedback on the following proposal: * We announce the availability of the new metadata somewhere, so that the individual maintainers know that the data is coming, and that they may want to take a look at it when it landed in their

Re: Pushing AppStream upstream metadata to KDE repositories...?

2014-05-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2014-05-10 19:16 GMT+02:00 Yuri Chornoivan yurc...@ukr.net: написане Sat, 10 May 2014 20:02:20 +0300, Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net: * I simply go ahead and commit the files to the respective repos. Since it's just data, it shouldn't break anything. Hi, Please use spellchecker

Re: Pushing AppStream upstream metadata to KDE repositories...?

2014-05-10 Thread Alvaro Soliverez
Hi, For KMyMoney, just go ahead and commit the file. We'll see the notification and adjust if needed. We use GPLv2+ for all our files. Regards, Alvaro KMyMoney Development Team On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net wrote: Hi there! I asked this a week ago,

Re: Pushing AppStream upstream metadata to KDE repositories...?

2014-05-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2014-05-11 1:24 GMT+02:00 Alvaro Soliverez asolive...@kde.org: Hi, For KMyMoney, just go ahead and commit the file. We'll see the notification and adjust if needed. We use GPLv2+ for all our files. Great, I'll do that in a second. Just a sidenote on why using the GPL etc. is not a good idea