Re: Re: Frameworks compiler and Qt requirements after Qt 5.7?

2015-06-26 Thread Mark Gaiser
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Alexander Potashev wrote: > Hi everyone, > > 2015-06-26 18:46 GMT+03:00 Martin Gräßlin : > > Thus I think the question about compiler requirement and Qt requirement > are > > not coupled. Just because we raise the one or the other doesn't mean we > should > > rai

Re: Frameworks compiler and Qt requirements after Qt 5.7?

2015-06-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday 26 June 2015 16:24:50 Mark Gaiser wrote: > Qt 5.7 minimal requirement > GCC 5.1 (or somewhere in 5.x) > Clang 3.6.1 (or perhaps even 3.7) > MSVC 2015 > > We then have full C++11 support across the board and much of C++14 > supported as well. MSVC clearly being the limiting one in that ar

Re: Frameworks compiler and Qt requirements after Qt 5.7?

2015-06-26 Thread Aleix Pol
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote: > Hi, > > If Qt's plans progress according to what they post on the mailinglist then > Qt 5.6 will be LTS, 5.7 will up the compiler requirements to the following: > > GCC 4.7 > Clang 3.2 > MSVC 2012 > > Framework currently requires: > GCC 4.5 > C

Re: Re: Frameworks compiler and Qt requirements after Qt 5.7?

2015-06-26 Thread Alexander Potashev
Hi everyone, 2015-06-26 18:46 GMT+03:00 Martin Gräßlin : > Thus I think the question about compiler requirement and Qt requirement are > not coupled. Just because we raise the one or the other doesn't mean we should > raise both. Correct. Consider the following workflow: the user installs the lat

Re: KSyCoca, Thread safety, and Cache invalidation

2015-06-26 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Freitag, 26. Juni 2015 18:03:00 CEST, Frank Reininghaus wrote: Hi, 2015-06-21 16:54 GMT+02:00 David Faure: On Friday 19 June 2015 22:00:09 Vishesh Handa wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:26 PM, David Faure wrote: ... I thought about it again, and there's a much simpler solution. We get rid

Re: KSyCoca, Thread safety, and Cache invalidation

2015-06-26 Thread Frank Reininghaus
Hi, 2015-06-21 16:54 GMT+02:00 David Faure: > On Friday 19 June 2015 22:00:09 Vishesh Handa wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:26 PM, David Faure wrote: >> > 3 bis: >> > I assume the threads without an event loop have some way to get tasks, >> > right? So when the gui thread gets notified about k

Re: Re: Frameworks compiler and Qt requirements after Qt 5.7?

2015-06-26 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Friday 26 June 2015 16:30:25 Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Friday 26 of June 2015 16:24:50 Mark Gaiser wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If Qt's plans progress according to what they post on the mailinglist then > > Qt 5.6 will be LTS, 5.7 will up the compiler requirements to the > > following: > > > > GCC 4

Re: Frameworks compiler and Qt requirements after Qt 5.7?

2015-06-26 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Friday 26 of June 2015 16:24:50 Mark Gaiser wrote: > Hi, > > If Qt's plans progress according to what they post on the mailinglist then > Qt 5.6 will be LTS, 5.7 will up the compiler requirements to the following: > > GCC 4.7 > Clang 3.2 > MSVC 2012 > > Framework currently requires: > GCC 4.5

Frameworks compiler and Qt requirements after Qt 5.7?

2015-06-26 Thread Mark Gaiser
Hi, If Qt's plans progress according to what they post on the mailinglist then Qt 5.6 will be LTS, 5.7 will up the compiler requirements to the following: GCC 4.7 Clang 3.2 MSVC 2012 Framework currently requires: GCC 4.5 Clang 3.1 MSVC 2012 When frameworks started it had slightly less strict co