Hello,
the kdepim is discussing how we can replace KDateTime inside kdepim (primarly
kcalcore) . There are some issues, why we can't replace it simply with
QDateTime.
* indivual timezone support, this is something that we need when parsing ical
and have no known timezone information. I havn't
On Saturday 01 August 2015 03:09:14 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christoph Cullmann wrote:
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the
incoming new bugs,
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John Layt j...@layt.net wrote:
If you do this you also need all of KLocale again which we also
do not want. Don't even go there, we changed it for a purpose.
Fwiw, over the year(s) of Plasma5, many times it was expressed
that KLocale is greatly missed,
On 1 August 2015 at 19:47, Sandro Knauß b...@sandroknauss.de wrote:
* indivual timezone support, this is something that we need when parsing ical
and have no known timezone information. I havn't looked into it, but I think
this can make it eventually into QDateTime.
This is the real problem
On Sunday 02 August 2015 17:08:04 Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John Layt j...@layt.net wrote:
If you do this you also need all of KLocale again which we also
do not want. Don't even go there, we changed it for a purpose.
Fwiw, over the year(s) of Plasma5, many
On Sunday 02 Aug 2015 14:26:18 John Layt wrote:
On 1 August 2015 at 19:47, Sandro Knauß b...@sandroknauss.de wrote:
* dateOnly support is used a lot. In ICAL it differs if you set dateonly or
datetime. dateonly events f.ex. lasts a day without timezone info f.ex. New
Year is a dateonly
On Sunday 02 August 2015 13:46:02 Christoph Cullmann wrote:
Hi,
is one of the problems the misuse of QDBus in KUniqueApplication before the
actual QApplication is constructed?
That's the working theory, but it's not proven. All I know is what Albert
reported when I asked him to test my
Hi,
is one of the problems the misuse of QDBus in KUniqueApplication before the
actual QApplication is constructed?
Would it be possible to just create in that case a temporary QCoreApplication
on the stack in KUniqueApplication::start?
Kate had similar I get stuck problems until the
On Saturday 01 August 2015 01:49:13 Daniel Vrátil wrote:
I like the idea of a nag and I don't think it necesarily conflicts with the
ideas above. Having a weekly/bi-weekly nags to developers would IMO work
(hey, you have 10 new bugs this week that you did not comment on or
confirmed yet,
