On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:15 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday 16 August 2015 23:36:33 Luigi Toscano wrote:
David Faure ha scritto:
On Sunday 16 August 2015 13:51:29 Michael Pyne wrote:
There's no reason even with our current build metadata that we'd *have* to
have project
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
I think we should be peachy now. Can plasma-pa be moved from kdereview to
kde/workspace?
Just my opinion as a plasma 5 user.
Yes, please! Kmix was great under KDE 4.xx, not so much under 5.xx. This
feels much better and
On Monday, 17 August 2015 20:04:04 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Other comments?
Nice, happy to see it -- it builds here, with a bunch of warnings:
[2/29] Generating index.cache.bz2
index.docbook:2: element para: validity error : ID gnu-fdl already defined
element div: validity error : ID
El Dimarts, 18 d'agost de 2015, a les 19:06:22, Jan Kundrát va escriure:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 20:04:04 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Other comments?
Nice, happy to see it -- it builds here, with a bunch of warnings:
[2/29] Generating index.cache.bz2
index.docbook:2: element para:
Jan Kundrát ha scritto:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 20:04:04 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Other comments?
Nice, happy to see it -- it builds here, with a bunch of warnings:
[2/29] Generating index.cache.bz2
index.docbook:2: element para: validity error : ID gnu-fdl already defined
GENERAL INFO
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs%20KDE-4.14%20stable-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/13/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:11:30 +
Build duration: 12 min
CHANGE SET
Revision
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Luigi Toscano luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it wrote:
David Faure ha scritto:
On Sunday 16 August 2015 13:51:29 Michael Pyne wrote:
There's no reason even with our current build metadata that we'd *have* to
have project hierarchies, as long as each underlying git
El Dimecres, 19 d'agost de 2015, a les 01:00:13, Christoph Feck va escriure:
On Monday 17 August 2015 20:04:04 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi guys, i just merged the frameworks port of rsibreak to master.
rsibreak is in the unmaintained silo, i'd like to bring it back to
extragear- utils (i
GENERAL INFO
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs%20KDE-4.14%20latest-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/14/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:11:30 +
Build duration: 41 min
CHANGE SET
Revision
That surprises me. It worked fine here as I've been testing it with
everything else built on master.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dimarts, 18 d'agost de 2015, a les 19:06:22, Jan Kundrát va escriure:
On Monday, 17 August 2015 20:04:04 CEST, Albert
On Monday 17 August 2015 20:04:04 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Hi guys, i just merged the frameworks port of rsibreak to master.
rsibreak is in the unmaintained silo, i'd like to bring it back to
extragear- utils (i guess kdeutils is too much for this niche
app?).
Anyone wants to review it?
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 01:00:13 CEST, Christoph Feck wrote:
-- Build files have been written to: /local/build/kf5/rsibreak
/local/git/extragear/utils/rsibreak/src/rsitimer.cpp:26:20: fatal
error: kdebug.h: No such file or directory
A missing dep on kde4libssupport,
On Wednesday, 19 August 2015 00:30:01 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
These messages are not new, IMHO does not apply to this request of bringing
back from unmaintiained ;)
I agree that it's not a blocker of course, but you asked for feedback :).
However, the worst thing is that the passive
On Friday 14 August 2015 23:53:44 Jarosław Staniek wrote:
Don't do that. If you use nullptr, there's no going back to zero because
it's not the same. You've irrevocably locked yourself into requiring a
compiler that supports it.
I should say back to Q_NULLPTR, right?
It's just helping
14 matches
Mail list logo
