Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

Le jeudi 10 novembre 2016, 23:42:36 CET Albert Astals Cid a écrit : > Hi, my proposal would be to make KDE Applications 17.08 the last release we > accept applications based on kdelibs4, that means people have a year until > KDE Applications 17.12 to port the applications from the list below to

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

Il giorno Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:42:36 +0100 Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > Comments? +1 from me, seems like a good idea. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B pgp8PgrKPav7L.pgp Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

El dijous, 10 de novembre de 2016, a les 23:42:36 CET, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > Hi, my proposal would be to make KDE Applications 17.08 the last release we > accept applications based on kdelibs4, that means people have a year until > KDE Applications 17.12 to port the applications from

Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

Hi, my proposal would be to make KDE Applications 17.08 the last release we accept applications based on kdelibs4, that means people have a year until KDE Applications 17.12 to port the applications from the list below to KF5. The ones that aren't ported we would just drop to unmaintained or if

Re: announcement: Kwave is in kdereview

El dijous, 10 de novembre de 2016, a les 6:07:14 CET, Thomas Eschenbacher va escriure: > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > [...] > > >> TODO: make kwave available in bugtracking / bugs.kde.org > > > > I think this is crucial, if it does not use bugs.kde.org personally i > > think it does not

Re: Review Request 129340: Make building drkonqi optional

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129340/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2016, 6:01 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 129339: Allow building kwalletd against gpgme++ from gpgme 1.7

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129339/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2016, 3:58 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 129340: Make building drkonqi optional

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129340/#review100759 --- +1 Thanks for bringing this up. Had the same patch lying

Re: announcement: Kwave is in kdereview

Albert Astals Cid wrote: [...] >> TODO: make kwave available in bugtracking / bugs.kde.org > > I think this is crucial, if it does not use bugs.kde.org personally i think > it > does not fulfill the Commitments of the manifesto Of course, I 100% agree! I already filed a sysadmin ticket for

Re: announcement: Kwave is in kdereview

Albert Astals Cid wrote: > [...] >> And the next question: are there any blocking points that prevent the >> application from going on to kdemultimedia? (any things that can not be >> handled by bugtracking?) > > That's a good question, i would expect [almost] everything we reported during > the

Re: Review Request 129339: Allow building kwalletd against gpgme++ from gpgme 1.7

> On Nov. 5, 2016, 10:39 a.m., Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > kwalletd/CMakeLists.txt, line 8 > > > > > > Please do this in reverse logic, same as in the kwallet.git commit you > > are referring to - that means