Re: liquidshell in kdereview

2019-04-14 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Sun, 14 Apr 2019 16:43:54 +0200 Martin Koller ha scritto: > The cmake file is the ultimate source for specifying what the > application depends on. Adding this somewhere else will easily get READMEs can be useful for packagers instead of manually watching the output of CMake or

Re: liquidshell in kdereview

2019-04-14 Thread Martin Koller
On Sonntag, 14. April 2019 12:44:20 CEST Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Saturday, 13 April 2019 14:08:18 CEST Martin Koller wrote: > > > # License issues > > > > > > None, actually. Well done. Consistent use of GPLv3+ everywhere. You might > > > want to add SPDX identifiers, but that would be the

Re: liquidshell in kdereview

2019-04-14 Thread Adriaan de Groot
On Saturday, 13 April 2019 14:08:18 CEST Martin Koller wrote: > > # License issues > > > > None, actually. Well done. Consistent use of GPLv3+ everywhere. You might > > want to add SPDX identifiers, but that would be the icing on the cake. > > Where, which and how would I need to add SPDX

Re: liquidshell in kdereview

2019-04-14 Thread Martin Koller
On Freitag, 12. April 2019 13:07:41 CEST Marco Martin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 7:59 AM Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Anyhow, while I do find it strange to market a non-feature in the features > > list, I don't have anything against it. > > I have a bit of a problem about putting doesn't use