Re: Work Branches

2019-10-05 Thread Valorie Zimmerman
Hey Ben and developers, On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:11 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently we had a discussion (which I think may have ended up spread > over a couple of mailing lists in the end) concerning branches and the > ability to force push to them. > > Current policy forbids

Re: Work Branches

2019-10-05 Thread Michael Reeves
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, 10:11 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently we had a discussion (which I think may have ended up spread > over a couple of mailing lists in the end) concerning branches and the > ability to force push to them. > > Current policy forbids force pushing to branches

Re: Work Branches

2019-10-05 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El dissabte, 5 d’octubre de 2019, a les 4:11:11 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > Hi all, > > Recently we had a discussion (which I think may have ended up spread > over a couple of mailing lists in the end) concerning branches and the > ability to force push to them. > > Current policy forbids

Re: Work Branches

2019-10-05 Thread Adriaan de Groot
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 04:11:11 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > 2) Protect all branches, aside from a given prefix (proposed to be work/) +1 for a simple and clear policy. [ade] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Work Branches

2019-10-05 Thread Volker Krause
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 04:11:11 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently we had a discussion (which I think may have ended up spread > over a couple of mailing lists in the end) concerning branches and the > ability to force push to them. > > Current policy forbids force pushing to