Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a small suggestion on how i think this should be fixed (since 2
desktop files for one app seems just ugly to me).
Perhaps it's better to extend the desktop file specification:
http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ar01s05.html
And i
Hi Mark,
have you seen my proposed improvement on your suggestion?
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-develm=131149560119520w=2
I suggest that you consider it, because it would avoid having to
update the Freedesktop specification and any DE that doesn't name its
programs differently in other DEs
Hi Mark,
I've done some small research on what components would have to be
updated for the desktop-specific-names solution. I think that would
be:
- The Desktop Entry Specification,
http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/
- KDE's KDesktopFile,
, and introduces unnecessary
coupling between the fields.
What do you think?
Regards,
Ambroz
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ambroz Bizjak ambr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
I am strongly opposed to the particular solution you are implementing
.
Regards,
Ambroz
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Thomas Lübking
thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:45:26 +0200
schrieb Ambroz Bizjak ambr...@gmail.com:
(Mark, sorry if you're getting this twice, I clicked the wrong Reply
button the first time...)
Hi Mark,
I understand
, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Thomas Lübking
thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ambroz, (and everybody else of course)
Am Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:39:27 +0200
schrieb Ambroz Bizjak ambr...@gmail.com:
Yes, that is what this extension would allow. It's a powerful tool,
and any powerful tool can be abused
thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:53:48 +0200
schrieb Ambroz Bizjak ambr...@gmail.com:
Hi Thomas,
I hope you are aware that my proposal is a technical solution and not
a social one.
No, it's probably not - see end of mail.
If the problem is two things from different DEs have
desktop configuration and GNOME desktop configuration, which is,
again, confusing.
Regards,
Ambroz
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Thomas Lübking
thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:27:40 +0200
schrieb Ambroz Bizjak ambr...@gmail.com:
Additionally, I make the following points
...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ambroz, (and everybody else of course)
Am Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:39:27 +0200
schrieb Ambroz Bizjak ambr...@gmail.com:
Yes, that is what this extension would allow. It's a powerful tool,
and any powerful tool can be abused.
If an application has a different name under
if we start from an all-privileged daemon like systemd. It's privilege
elevation that suffers.
does the session systemd run privileged in the first place?
I have no clue. I don't even know if there's a session systemd.
I'm not sure exactly how you people are planning to make use of
That doesn't quite work, for me at least. See the bug I reported
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297720
Nobody seems to care though.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:21 PM, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jacopo De Simoi wilder...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear
a
message box for every single file. Right now, they have the option to wait
until the operation is completed, then close the first (and only) message
box and be happy.
Ambroz Bizjak wrote:
How about aggregating all the errors/warnings in a single dialog box as a
list? E.g
12 matches
Mail list logo
