. 13, 2011, 1:15 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103403/
---
(Updated Dec. 13, 2011
---
On Dec. 13, 2011, 1:15 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103403
On July 28, 2011, 10:26 a.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I don't think it is good for unit-tests to test different things depending
on environment variables (
@David, what is your opinion on the subject?)
I was actually about to commit a simpler fix:
@@ -26,11 +26,11
On July 2, 2011, 9:49 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
hmm. but now things are still done twice in a kde session, no?
what was wrong with the suggestion to notify qt that it should update
stuff?
Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
createApplicationPalette() is indeed called twice when running
On July 28, 2011, 10:26 a.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
I don't think it is good for unit-tests to test different things depending
on environment variables (
@David, what is your opinion on the subject?)
I was actually about to commit a simpler fix:
@@ -26,11 +26,11
Le 25/07/2011 19:51, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Mon, 25.07.11 17:40, Giovanni Campagna (scampa.giova...@gmail.com) wrote:
The spec does not provide a list of shared keys, does such a list exist?
If there is no such list I don't see how we could share anything.
Le 24/07/2011 12:55, Giovanni Campagna a écrit :
Which is a KDE bug. You should use GNOME shortcuts when possible. I
mean, Gtk has emacs and Mac OS modes for keybindings, I doubt Qt hasn't
something similar.
It is true that you can change KDE theme without changing the GTK one,
but why
Le 23/07/2011 12:33, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
On 2011-07-23 at 11:27, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com a écrit:
I don't think Shauns proposal addresses the issue, really.
Why? Do you have an example that would show where Shaun's proposal
falls short?
it
On July 2, 2011, 9:49 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
hmm. but now things are still done twice in a kde session, no?
what was wrong with the suggestion to notify qt that it should update
stuff?
Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
createApplicationPalette() is indeed called twice when running
Le 20/07/2011 11:52, Alex Fiestas a écrit :
Hi there
Last few days I have been patching some pieces of our workspace here and
there, the first set of patches I did them directly into master which if
I remember correctly was against the policy.
So, the second round of fixes I tried to do
On July 2, 2011, 9:49 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
hmm. but now things are still done twice in a kde session, no?
what was wrong with the suggestion to notify qt that it should update
stuff?
Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
createApplicationPalette() is indeed called twice when running
On July 2, 2011, 9:49 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
hmm. but now things are still done twice in a kde session, no?
what was wrong with the suggestion to notify qt that it should update
stuff?
Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
createApplicationPalette() is indeed called twice when running
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101805/#review4333
---
On July 2, 2011, 9:19 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
---
This is an automatically
/#review4278
---
On June 30, 2011, 3:36 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101805
On 19/05/2011 08:01, Kevin Krammer wrote:
On Wednesday, 2011-05-18, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Git commit 388edfe3362c07c0d46b3990a325258684aaeb97 by Aurélien Gâteau.
Committed on 18/05/2011 at 22:27.
Pushed by gateau into branch 'master'.
Get rid of the deprecated KMessageWidget::MessageType
Git commit 388edfe3362c07c0d46b3990a325258684aaeb97 by Aurélien Gâteau.
Committed on 18/05/2011 at 22:27.
Pushed by gateau into branch 'master'.
Get rid of the deprecated KMessageWidget::MessageType enum values
I checked with lxr.kde.org and fixed existing users, so it shouldn't
break any build
Git commit a7801bf4fd347462840df1a62e718f77cf489a5b by Aurélien Gâteau.
Committed on 11/05/2011 at 06:41.
Pushed by gateau into branch 'master'.
Shorten length of MessageType enums
KMessageWidget::MessageType enums were annoying to type because they are
quite long. I shortened them by removing
On May 9, 2011, 10:45 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Looks good. I would even go a bit further and suggest the following:
- Remove the Clear button, I don't think it serves any purpose
- Change the label of the OK button to Create Link
Jonathan Marten wrote:
Good idea to remove
On 09/05/2011 09:31, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
On 07/05/2011 10:43, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Hi,
As part of my work on the image comparison feature in Gwenview, I want
to make it possible to restore trashed images from within Gwenview (in
case the user trashes the wrong image while comparing
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101312/#review3233
---
Looks good. I would even go a bit further and suggest the
Hi,
As part of my work on the image comparison feature in Gwenview, I want
to make it possible to restore trashed images from within Gwenview (in
case the user trashes the wrong image while comparing).
In the past I have been duplicating code from libkonq in Gwenview
because kdegraphics was not
---
On April 30, 2011, 1:10 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101249
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101249/
---
(Updated April 30, 2011, 1:10 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
On 23/04/2011 23:22, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
Aurélien, I am writing regarding
http://agateau.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/kde-ux-2011/
One thing, about deploying the kmessagewidget (and similar things) in
kdelibs. If it's part of kdelibs 4.7 or something, apps that support
kdelibs 4.7 would have
On 10/12/2010 00:44, David Faure wrote:
Yes, this will crash with QT_FATAL_WARNINGS. So? It's good to have a unit
test test border conditions too, even if these conditions lead to
warnings from Qt.
One could try to use QTest::ignoreMessage() [1] to skip expected error
messages.
Does not
On 09/12/2010 17:52, David Faure wrote:
On Tuesday 07 December 2010, Jaime wrote:
Hi,
I've run the kdelibs with the environment variable QT_FATAL_WARNINGS=1,
and the number of failed tests has grown in a noticeable way. (also with 2
crashes).
I guess that less Qt warnings usually means
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6022/
---
(Updated 2010-12-02 16:51:19.493828)
Review request for kdelibs and Kevin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6022/
---
Review request for kdelibs and Kevin Ottens.
Summary
---
If a someone
---
On 2010-12-01 17:01:44, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6022
SVN commit 1196662 by gateau:
Removed KStandardAction::showHideStatusbar() and showHideMenubar()
CCMAIL:kde-core-devel@kde.org
M +0 -50 actions/kstandardaction.cpp
M +0 -12 actions/kstandardaction.h
M +8 -9 xmlgui/kxmlguiwindow.cpp
---
On 08/11/2010 14:18, Thomas Lübking wrote:
Am Monday 08 November 2010 schrieb Johannes Sixt:
How is a checkable menu entry that is not checked different from a menu
entry that is not checkable, hm? There is *no* difference.
Broken UI style? There *can be* a difference ;-P
Unchecked Box:
Hi,
I have been quite busy trying to convince everyone actions to toggle UI
items such as menubar, toolbars, sidebars or statusbar should be labeled
Show/hide Foo depending on the visibility of Foo rather than
implemented as a checkable [ ] Show Foo item.
Having started to work on converting
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
