KDE Frameworks Documentation

2011-09-28 Thread Ignat Semenov
. I might even go as far as creating a blog and posting this to raise public awareness of the issue. Best regards, Ignat Semenov aka thorGT

Re: KDE Frameworks Documentation

2011-09-29 Thread Ignat Semenov
there was something else, that was a year ago :) I probably got lost in the stack, there were too many layers. Next, how can I debug asynchronous calls, like those in the Job API? Regards, Ignat Semenov P.S. Could you please add me to the whitelist? I would like to keep the inbox clean and empty

Review Request: Check KFileItem d pointer for validity in KFileItem methods

2012-10-15 Thread Ignat Semenov
be checked for validity, looked it up in the code. Diffs - kio/kio/kfileitem.cpp 8ab5a1d Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106902/diff/ Testing --- Builds fine. Thanks, Ignat Semenov

Re: Review Request: Check KFileItem d pointer for validity in KFileItem methods

2012-10-15 Thread Ignat Semenov
, Ignat Semenov

Re: Review Request: Check KFileItem d pointer for validity in KFileItem methods

2012-10-16 Thread Ignat Semenov
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106902/diff/ Testing --- Builds fine. Thanks, Ignat Semenov

Re: Review Request: Check KFileItem d pointer for validity in KFileItem methods

2012-10-16 Thread Ignat Semenov
/106902/diff/ Testing --- Builds fine. Thanks, Ignat Semenov

Re: Review Request: Check KFileItem d pointer for validity in KFileItem methods

2012-10-16 Thread Ignat Semenov
/ Testing --- Builds fine. Thanks, Ignat Semenov

Re: Review Request: Check KFileItem d pointer for validity in KFileItem methods

2012-10-16 Thread Ignat Semenov
/#comment16158 I was actually thinking about url.isEmpty(), but probably got confused by your solution :) - Ignat Semenov On Oct. 16, 2012, 4:15 p.m., Ignat Semenov wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply

Re: Review Request: Check KFileItem d pointer for validity in KFileItem methods

2012-10-16 Thread Ignat Semenov
--- On Oct. 16, 2012, 4:15 p.m., Ignat Semenov wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106902