parley GPLv3+, however the COPYING file still lists GPLv2 as the
> license. The best solution would be to relicense the file to GPLv2+.
>
> Would you (who are listed in the copyright headers: Inge Wallin and Andreas
> Xavier) allow for this relicensing?
>
> Tha
On Feb. 13, 2015, 11:39 p.m., Marko Käning wrote:
I'd vote for keeping it compatible to Qt 5.3, if that's possible.
+1. Depending on 5.4 in applications already is bad enough even though it can
sometimes be necessary but I am against it for our base stuff. Especially in
this case where
On Monday, February 09, 2015 04:09:59 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
kosse...@kde.org wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Februar 2015, 00:23:58 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
El Diumenge, 8 de febrer de 2015, a les 00:29:26, Friedrich W. H.
Kossebau
va
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 20:07:42 Eike Hein wrote:
On 01/31/2015 10:37 AM, Jan Kundrát wrote:
I'd like to summarize my current feelings on both proposals.
Here's what I think gerrit's strong points are:
* There's undeniably synergy and cultural alignment with
middleware
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 22:41:36 Jan Kundrát wrote:
On Saturday, 31 January 2015 21:38:23 CEST, Inge Wallin wrote:
It is one thing if there is one tool that is totally too weak to work for
experienced people and one tool that is awesome but very
difficult to learn.
But that's
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 23:14:01 Ben Cooksley wrote:
About the only point left standing is that it doesn't check individual
subcommits, but we've yet to see whether the KDE project as a whole
sees this as necessary - especially considering that the vast majority
of projects would use CI
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 10:37:26 Jan Kundrát wrote:
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 21:03:32 CEST, Eike Hein wrote:
I think it's a real concern, and I'm wary of we can patch
it away because carrying a huge custom patch delta for UI
mods is what kept us from upgrading Bugzilla for
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 03:30:48 Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Samstag, 24. Januar 2015 15:24:28 CET, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
But beyond review functionality, I think moving towards a more
integrated solution is clearly a step in the right direction, and this
is what makes the choice
not exactly an expert for sane code).
It doesn't seem to be designed for lots of data (since each point is an
object, etc.), which is understandable; but eventually it would be a nice
feature to add API designed towards such data in the future?
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 12:41:22 Inge Wallin
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 23:26:58 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dissabte, 25 de gener de 2014, a les 12:17:05, Sebastian Gottfried va
escriure:
Hi everyone,
Hi
some time ago I was in need for a graphing component for my application
(KTouch). As the applications UI is done entirely
On Monday, July 08, 2013 15:04:40 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
Now that kde-workspace and kdelibs are going to be frozen (which in theory
means less work for everybody) I'd like to propose a new release schedule to
be applied starting with 4.12.
Basically the idea is to cut testing time and
On Sunday, July 01, 2012 07:02:28 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
I'm actually not sure kde-core-devel is the right list... But the e.V.
mailing list certainly isn't, and we don't seem to have any place for
discussions that affect KDE as a whole.
In any case, Ingo Malchow said in his blog
On Friday, June 15, 2012 13:05:44 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Hi all,
During our sprint in Pineda de Mar, we sat down and thought about how our
release cycles relate to the structures in our software, we came up with
the following proposal we'd like you to consider and provide feedback
about.
On Friday, November 12, 2010 11:37:43 Inge Wallin wrote:
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 00:29:32 Thiago Macieira wrote:
D-Bus community is proposing to do away with the session bus and replace
it with a user bus. Long story short, this means that multiple logins of
the same user
14 matches
Mail list logo
