well earned break and come back whenever it suites you
> again!
+100. I can relate to that :)
Thanks for all the enduring work you did for KDE, Christoph! Come back when
time permits it again!
Cheers,
Kevin
> Cheers
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
eant to be a set of tools and components that help one to
> >> create QML-based HMI/SCADA software.
> >>
> >> The project has been started few years ago, because I couldn't find any
> >> open-source, QML-based HMI/SCADA framework I could put my things into.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Michal Policht
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday, 5 March 2019 21:11:11 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimarts, 19 de febrer de 2019, a les 7:35:58 CET, Kevin Funk va escriure:
> > On Monday, 18 February 2019 17:06:25 CET Michael Reeves wrote:
> > > https://download.kde.org/stable/applications/18.12.1/src/kdiff3-
same versioning.
Hey,
Anyhow, to help you out on that regard:
You'll want to check out craft-blueprints-kde.git, and there find the kdiff3
subfolder.
You'll probably need to add a separate version.ini file there with custom
versions/urls. See e.g. kmymoney/version.ini as example.
Regards,
Kev
sis which need to get out to users ASAP. At least for
kdiff3 I'd rather have a conservative approach in that regard, since it's a
complex tool by definition.
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
o you
> > find
> > a random person to be your incubator guy? Because as it happens, it's the
> > second time in a month or something that i have to volunteer.
>
> Ah! That is interesting feedback. You're correct that we're currently
> assuming that someone will step in to do t
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 16:24:10 CET Michael Reeves wrote:
> A little confused on where to start with this sponsor thing.
Huh? 'sponsor thing'? :)
Care to elaborate what you mean?
Regards,
Kevin
> On Jan 19, 2018 3:52 PM, "Kevin Funk" <kf...@kde.org> wrote:
> &
follows our rules & procedures.
>
> I understand you want to continue maintaining the new kdiff3 and you are not
> just "dumping it" into us, right?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Albert
>
> El divendres, 12 de gener de 2018, a les 1:21:02 CET, Joachim Eibl
egards,
Kevin
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
RESET hidden)
225:set(CMAKE_VISIBILITY_INLINES_HIDDEN 1)
Regards,
Kevin
> Thanks, Shaheed
>
> [1] I'm also a bit mystified by the fact that I am deliberately querying
> CMake for the COMPILE_FLAGS to use, but I have not seen -fvisibility
> anywhere...
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.o
have a hard time
finding contributors for the majority of our *existing* projects.
Regards,
Kevin
> > Best regards/Schöne Grüße
> >
> > Martin
> > A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
> > Q: Why is top posting bad?
> >
> > () asc
> On July 31, 2017, 9:11 a.m., Kevin Funk wrote:
> > processui/ksysguardprocesslist.cpp, line 354
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128854/diff/3/?file=498252#file498252line354>
> >
> > Why this?
>
> Gregor Mi wrote:
> When I try to capt
kde.org/r/128854/#comment68895>
Why this?
- Kevin Funk
On July 28, 2017, 12:20 p.m., Gregor Mi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.revi
his should get less and less by
time, let's move that over to kde-devel@ until it's 'dead'.
Cheers,
Kevin
> What do people that read this list think?
>
> Cheers,
> Albert
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
nsider me in as well.
Cheers,
Kevin
> Greetings,
> Sven
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Heya,
I'm trying to figure out why certain KDevelop apidocs are missing from
api.kde.org.
Where are the logs?
Someone on IRC told me there should be:
http://api.kde.org/logs/ -> 404
Ideas?
Cheers
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Descript
extending the power to create general purpose mainline repositories
> > (and certain other actions within Phabricator) to a number of
> > community members. They will be contacted individually over the next
> > month or two regarding this.
> >
> > Comments on the a
On Monday, March 7, 2016 1:23:01 PM CET Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Monday, March 7, 2016 11:10:13 AM CET Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Kevin Funk wrote:
> > > Is there a way to batch-modify those versions? Obviously noone wants to
>
On Monday, March 7, 2016 11:10:13 AM CET Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Kevin Funk wrote:
> > Is there a way to batch-modify those versions? Obviously noone wants to go
> > through the Bugzilla UI, adding versions one-by-one for each(!) framework
Applications,
etc.
Cheers,
Kevin
[1]
http://blog.asymptotic.co.uk/software-development-log/batch-modifying-bugzilla-milestones/
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ally catch more
> bugs/regressions.
>
> Comments?
>
> Cheers,
> Albert
Sounds good to me. We should try it out.
Worth the slowdown of the ASAN-enabled programs on the CI.
Cheers
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
nly place lxr.kde.org pointed out to use the *TEST_EXPORT approach
> > was
> > grantlee, which simply creates a separate file with the define that then
> > is
> > appended to the file generated with generate_export_header:
> > http://lxr.kde.org/source/grantlee/temp
On Feb. 13, 2015, 8:41 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we should first
ensure the CI system is prepared for building with the new dependency.
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
It does
the duplicate ones in other CMakeLists.txt files.
- Kevin Funk
On Feb. 11, 2015, 9:43 p.m., Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122534
On Friday 06 February 2015 19:46:28 Michael Pyne wrote:
On Fri, February 6, 2015 15:11:22 Kevin Funk wrote:
On Thursday 05 February 2015 22:16:54 Michael Pyne wrote:
However as of now it only reorders modules you pull into the build list,
so
you still need to specify dependencies
make your own kdesrc-buildrc that does
the same thing; you can consider them as maintained sample files.
Regards,
- Michael Pyne
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
, if they don't
know they cannot use it and cause harm to their files anyway.
Also, the name uninstall indicates it's a destructive operation, so you have
been warned.
+1 for defining this by default
Alex
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
for providing a kdevplatform_add_plugin macro (awesome!)
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
On Sunday 23 November 2014 23:37:45 Kevin Funk wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2014 17:54:21 Milian Wolff wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2014 10:39:02 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de wrote:
Hey all,
in my quest
, generated from kdevpatchreview.desktop via
kcoreaddons_desktop_to_json(...) during the CMake run.
Cheers
--
Kevin Funk | kf...@kde.org | http://kfunk.org
=331724.
- Kevin Funk
On June 18, 2014, 9:51 p.m., Jeremy Whiting wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118816
. Noone worked on
this for years now.
Personally I'd just get rid off the debug output, seems like noone cares
anyway. (I'm also annoyed by the useless output)
- Kevin Funk
On Jan. 28, 2014, 1 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote
the
allocator (along its provided memory pool) being deleted too early.
I also replaced the qDebug usage with printfs because I got similar crashes at
shutdown.
Greets
--
Kevin Funk
Am Montag, 10. Februar 2014, 20:38:15 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
El Dilluns, 10 de febrer de 2014, a les 12:14:31, Kevin Funk va escriure:
Am Montag, 10. Februar 2014, 01:28:03 schrieb Thomas Lübking:
On Sonntag, 9. Februar 2014 22:16:16 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
So while exiting
---
On Jan. 3, 2014, 5:52 p.m., Kevin Funk wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114715
into your way when reading or writing code. Your compiler
is clever enough to error out when they're missing, and it doesn't harm
(semantically) if they're redundant.
Any thoughts anyone?
Cheers,
Kevin
Just my two cents.
Greets
--
Kevin Funk
/util/kcompletion.cpp 340aa92b900d670e2ad73f70a63d5221d0feed1d
kdeui/util/kcompletion_p.h 1cf31db3f16fe3421415cd54265eee20bb998710
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114715/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
marked as submitted.
Review request for kdelibs.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
---
Add .reviewboardrc
Diffs
-
.reviewboardrc PRE-CREATION
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113858/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
ce6c2c45338edbe470ba8f040dd3a3e829073d9c
solid/solid/backends/win/winopticaldrive.cpp
fd87eb982a75ff2cff48f9f5ab5e13ac400d9a5e
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113857/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113954/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
fd87eb982a75ff2cff48f9f5ab5e13ac400d9a5e
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113857/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
---
Add .reviewboardrc
Diffs
-
.reviewboardrc PRE-CREATION
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113858/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
/108770/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
6ca8eed3ebf8c6f0f5c68d8843bd09a3ea928bbd
kdecore/jobs/kcompositejob.cpp 5ddabd71e5bbb5f0a555a201223a52950b85e786
kdecore/jobs/kcompositejob_p.h bef06e9bff532b45a8d66380a65117737275be9e
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108770/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
kdecore/tests/kcompositejobtest.h PRE-CREATION
kdecore/tests/kcompositejobtest.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108770/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
kdecore/jobs/kcompositejob_p.h bef06e9bff532b45a8d66380a65117737275be9e
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108770/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Kevin Funk
a boolean variable indicating that the item was found, then
doing if (!success) {...} after the for loop. Avoid return statements in
deeply nested code (hard to debug).
- Kevin Funk
On Feb. 20, 2012, 5:18 p.m., Ralf Jung wrote
48 matches
Mail list logo
