Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-18 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 18 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:37:59, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Antonis Tsiapaliokas
Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch needed. Regards, Antonis

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 17 December 2012, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va escriure: Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23,

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch needed. The attached patch should

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote: Not really. For the frameworks branch the most current cmake is required, which is 2.8.10.1 currently. We will stay there with the most current until we get somewhat stable. I see. My post seems to date back then

cmake.git (Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master)

2012-12-17 Thread David Faure
[How many lists do I need to read this thread on? Cutting the cross-posting off] On Monday 17 December 2012 17:46:51 Laszlo Papp wrote: PS.: If only the entry barrier was not so high for even a basic tool like cmake. It is certainly not a problem for me as an arch user, but I can understand

Re: cmake.git (Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master)

2012-12-17 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2012, 23:11:14 schrieb David Faure: [How many lists do I need to read this thread on? Cutting the cross-posting off] On Monday 17 December 2012 17:46:51 Laszlo Papp wrote: PS.: If only the entry barrier was not so high for even a basic tool like cmake. It is

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:37:59, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas va escriure: Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached patch

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Luigi Toscano
Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas va escriure: Hello, Attached, can somebody give it a try ? Alex I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va escriure: Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas va escriure: Hello,