On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Matthew Dawson matt...@mjdsystems.ca wrote:
On December 25, 2014 08:21:05 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
The way I see it, there are two reasonable alternatives with the current
setup:
1) Everybody can create, delete and force-push to all branches except the
On Monday, 29 December 2014 09:50:06 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Unfortunately allowing force pushes is an extremely messy business
with the hooks - so we're unable to do this (for maintenance reasons
among others).
Could you please elaborate on this one?
The only reason I remember ever hearing
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Jan Kundrát j...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday, 29 December 2014 09:50:06 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Unfortunately allowing force pushes is an extremely messy business
with the hooks - so we're unable to do this (for maintenance reasons
among others).
Could you
El Dijous, 25 de desembre de 2014, a les 20:29:12, Thomas Friedrichsmeier va
escriure:
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 20:21:05 +1300
Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
[...]
1) Everybody can create, delete and force-push to all branches
except the reserved ones (kde/*, master, stable,... see
On Thursday 25 December 2014 20:29:12 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 20:21:05 +1300
Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
3) People are free to create and delete to all branches below work/*.
Creation and deletion of branches outside this would be limited to
project
On December 25, 2014 08:21:05 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
The way I see it, there are two reasonable alternatives with the current
setup:
1) Everybody can create, delete and force-push to all branches except the
reserved ones (kde/*, master, stable,... see the list).
2) People are free
On Wednesday 24 December 2014 00.04:22 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi all,
As the other thread has gotten a bit congested with various threads, I
thought I would split up the topics to make things a bit easier to
manage.
The first seems the least contentious: allowing all developers to
delete
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Christian Mollekopf
chrig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Wednesday 24 December 2014 00.04:22 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi all,
As the other thread has gotten a bit congested with various threads, I
thought I would split up the topics to make things a bit easier to
On Thursday, 25 December 2014 08:21:05 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
In essence, yes - those are the two possible options we have.
Force pushing will *still* be prohibited under this proposal as it
stands (and would be a CoC violation if done).
Hi Ben,
this is a very strong statement. I'm believe
On Wednesday 24 December 2014 13:57:15 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Unfortunately i'm not sure if Gitolite's ACL mechanisms let us
differentiate between tags and branches so if we allow anyone to
delete branches they'll probably be able to do the same for tags.
Then it's definitely something to pay
El Dimecres, 24 de desembre de 2014, a les 14:05:54, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 06:27:01 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 23 de desembre de 2014, a les 14:48:21, Sebastian Kügler va
El Dimecres, 24 de desembre de 2014, a les 10:48:43, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
On Wednesday 24 December 2014 13:57:15 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Unfortunately i'm not sure if Gitolite's ACL mechanisms let us
differentiate between tags and branches so if we allow anyone to
delete branches they'll
Hi!
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 14:11:46 +1300
Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
That brings the list of protected branches requested thus far to:
master
frameworks
KDE/*
Applications/*
Plasma/*
Calligra/*
Any others?
Extragear apps may have different names for release series branches.
On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 01:57:15 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Unfortunately i'm not sure if Gitolite's ACL mechanisms let us
differentiate between tags and branches so if we allow anyone to
delete branches they'll probably be able to do the same for tags.
Are the generated config files or
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Jan Kundrát j...@kde.org wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 01:57:15 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Unfortunately i'm not sure if Gitolite's ACL mechanisms let us
differentiate between tags and branches so if we allow anyone to
delete branches they'll probably
Hi all,
As the other thread has gotten a bit congested with various threads, I
thought I would split up the topics to make things a bit easier to
manage.
The first seems the least contentious: allowing all developers to
delete branches on our mainline repositories, except for certain
protected
On Wednesday 24 December 2014 00:04:22 Ben Cooksley wrote:
The first seems the least contentious: allowing all developers to
delete branches on our mainline repositories, except for certain
protected branches (like master and KDE/* for instance).
Any suggestions or variations on this?
I
On Wednesday, December 24, 2014 00:04:22 Ben Cooksley wrote:
The first seems the least contentious: allowing all developers to
delete branches on our mainline repositories, except for certain
protected branches (like master and KDE/* for instance).
I'd add frameworks to that, it has a status
El Dimecres, 24 de desembre de 2014, a les 00:04:22, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
Hi all,
As the other thread has gotten a bit congested with various threads, I
thought I would split up the topics to make things a bit easier to
manage.
The first seems the least contentious: allowing all
El Dimarts, 23 de desembre de 2014, a les 14:48:21, Sebastian Kügler va
escriure:
On Wednesday, December 24, 2014 00:04:22 Ben Cooksley wrote:
The first seems the least contentious: allowing all developers to
delete branches on our mainline repositories, except for certain
protected
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi all,
As the other thread has gotten a bit congested with various threads, I
thought I would split up the topics to make things a bit easier to
manage.
The first seems the least contentious: allowing all developers to
delete branches on our mainline
I'd add Applications/* and Plasma/* to this.
Would it be possible to add the Calligra/* release branches to that
Seems that release branches are starting with capital letters. Would that be
possible and sufficient for the deletable-branch heuristic?
--
Cheerio,
Ivan
KDE, ivan.cukic at
On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 06:27:01 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 23 de desembre de 2014, a les 14:48:21, Sebastian Kügler va
escriure:
On Wednesday, December 24, 2014 00:04:22 Ben Cooksley wrote:
The first seems the least contentious: allowing all developers to
delete
On Wednesday 24 December 2014 00:04:22 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi all,
As the other thread has gotten a bit congested with various threads, I
thought I would split up the topics to make things a bit easier to
manage.
The first seems the least contentious: allowing all developers to
delete
On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 17:29:05 Ivan Čukić wrote:
I'd add Applications/* and Plasma/* to this.
Would it be possible to add the Calligra/* release branches to that
Seems that release branches are starting with capital letters. Would that
be possible and sufficient for the
On Tuesday 23 December 2014 17:45:23 Milian Wolff wrote:
+1 to all of the above. What about tags btw? In KDevelop e.g. it would only
be a nuisance if someone would delete one of our stable branches, but
deleting one of the release tags would be ugly as I'd then need to figure
out what commit
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 23 December 2014 17:45:23 Milian Wolff wrote:
+1 to all of the above. What about tags btw? In KDevelop e.g. it would only
be a nuisance if someone would delete one of our stable branches, but
deleting one of the
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 06:27:01 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 23 de desembre de 2014, a les 14:48:21, Sebastian Kügler va
escriure:
On Wednesday, December 24, 2014 00:04:22 Ben Cooksley wrote:
The first
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Boudewijn Rempt b...@valdyas.org wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi all,
As the other thread has gotten a bit congested with various threads, I
thought I would split up the topics to make things a bit easier to
manage.
The first seems the
29 matches
Mail list logo
