On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Martin Sandsmark
martin.sandsm...@kde.org wrote:
Distinguished Sirs and Madams,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
Mangonel has just been moved to KDE Review.
The KDE Review process is set to be two weeks, and if Mangonel
Distinguished Sirs and Madams,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
Mangonel has just been moved to KDE Review.
The KDE Review process is set to be two weeks, and if Mangonel calculator
isn't completely wrong, that period is now up.
Since all the issues raised are
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:07:13PM +0200, Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
If there is no Help button and no desktop file, there is not much
sense in making docbooks.
I agree.
I propose just add an item to UserBase launchers list [1] and some
tiny page based on README.md.
I'll be sure to market it
Hello List,
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 23:12:01 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 8 de gener de 2013, a les 21:08:11, Martin Sandsmark va
escriure:
Dear Sirs and Madams,
Mangonel has just been moved to KDE Review.
Mangonel is a simple and lightweight application launcher in the
On 2013年01月09日 08:09, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
Any reason not to use bugs.kde.org?
Fixed.
Hi, I see you made the change :
-aboutData-setBugAddress(QByteArray(bugs.mango...@tarmack.eu));
+aboutData-setBugAddress(QByteArray(https://bugs.kde.org/;));
Hmm, that is not going to work.
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 08:56:25 Jekyll Wu wrote:
If you plan to
use bugs.kde.org as the tracker, then you don't need to call
setBugAddress() at all. The default value just works.
Fixed.
And don't forget to ask sysadmins to create a mangonel product on
bugs.kde.org :)
Done.
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 18:35:49 Martin Sandsmark wrote:
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 19:30:45 Allen Winter wrote:
No docbook manual
I guess I'll to contact the doc team for this?
Do you want apidox generated? if so you also need a Mainpage.dox
No need for that (yet, at least, we
El Dimecres, 9 de gener de 2013, a les 01:09:28, Martin Sandsmark va escriure:
Hi, thanks for the review!
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 23:12:01 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Which is its intended destination extragear-something?
Yes, sorry, I forgot to mention, it is destined for extragear/base.
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 19:49:36 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
You should probably make it look like
i18nc(some context of what stuff is, (%1), application.type)
Just in case someone needs to do something different with the parenthesis.
Okay, fixed. Thanks :-)
--
Martin Sandsmark
KDE
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 19:45:27 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
There is one mail already on the list, so it is already spread.
Okay, so the proverbial cat's out of the bag I guess, so I just added his
email to the license headers.
--
Martin Sandsmark
KDE
написане Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:35:49 +0200, Martin Sandsmark
martin.sandsm...@kde.org:
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 19:30:45 Allen Winter wrote:
No docbook manual
I guess I'll to contact the doc team for this?
If there is no Help button and no desktop file, there is not much sense
in making
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 09:07:13 PM Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
написане Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:35:49 +0200, Martin Sandsmark
martin.sandsm...@kde.org:
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 19:30:45 Allen Winter wrote:
No docbook manual
I guess I'll to contact the doc team for this?
If there is
Dear Sirs and Madams,
Mangonel has just been moved to KDE Review.
Mangonel is a simple and lightweight application launcher in the vein of
Katapult from ye olde KDE 3 days, kind of reminiscent of the task oriented
UI for krunner, but dropping the slow krunner architecture in favour of a
El Dimarts, 8 de gener de 2013, a les 21:08:11, Martin Sandsmark va escriure:
Dear Sirs and Madams,
Mangonel has just been moved to KDE Review.
Mangonel is a simple and lightweight application launcher in the vein of
Katapult from ye olde KDE 3 days, kind of reminiscent of the task
Hi, thanks for the review!
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 23:12:01 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Which is its intended destination extragear-something?
Yes, sorry, I forgot to mention, it is destined for extragear/base.
Any reason not to use bugs.kde.org?
Fixed.
The i18n is quite broken, a simple
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 09:08:11 PM Martin Sandsmark wrote:
Dear Sirs and Madams,
Mangonel has just been moved to KDE Review.
No docbook manual
Do you want apidox generated? if so you also need a Mainpage.dox
Bart's email address is missing from the Copyright statements in many files.
16 matches
Mail list logo
