darn.
Now that I did it all
On 05/23/2012 01:34 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
Sebastian
Change of plans. As per recent discussions with tsdgeos and kde_pepo on
#kde-devel -
They would like to avoid too many new repositories. So, if it's okay
with you we'll keep the nepomuk-kde-config and
Does anyone have suggestions on where nepomuk-kde-kio and
nepomuk-kde-config should be placed?
I was thinking under kde-baseaps, but that might not be correct. Any
suggestions?
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday, 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
Sebastian
Change of plans. As per recent discussions with tsdgeos and kde_pepo on
#kde-devel -
They would like to avoid too many new repositories. So, if it's okay with
you we'll keep the nepomuk-kde-config and nepomuk-kde-kio code in
kde-runtime, while the rest can be removed as it is there in
Hey
I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk.
As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories -
* nepomuk-core [1]
* nepomuk-kde-kio [2]
* nepomuk-kde-config [3]
kde-runtime/nepomuk will be removed. Kdelibs will not be touched. All the
headers are being installed under
Forgot to add the correct kde-packagers email.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
Hey
I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk.
As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories -
* nepomuk-core [1]
* nepomuk-kde-kio [2]
*
El Dijous, 17 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:14, Vishesh Handa va escriure:
Hey
@Translators: You probably want to preserve the translations in
kde-runtime/nepomuk. How do we go about this?
That's not a problem.
Albert
On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
@Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in
nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break a lot of
things.
NACK.
this is a completely no go.
/Sune
I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus
interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are
supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...
On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus
interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are
supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...
Great. thanks.
hugs and kisses
/Sune
On
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg tr...@kde.org wrote:
I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus
interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are
supposed to be used instead
10 matches
Mail list logo
