On Monday 03 August 2015 19:36:30 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org wrote:
I'm filtering out all kdepim bug reports (yeah, I could just
unsubscribe from the list). I'll certainly filter out the nag mails
as well.
If I was still interested
- Original Message -
On Friday, July 31, 2015 09:55:30 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 19:29:53 CEST, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
I also do not see the point in nagging the user after a certain period of
time if nobody else ever cared to comment on the bug. Feels a bit
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org wrote:
On Saturday 01 August 2015 01:49:13 Daniel Vrátil wrote:
I like the idea of a nag and I don't think it necesarily conflicts with the
ideas above. Having a weekly/bi-weekly nags to developers would IMO work
(hey, you have 10
On Saturday 01 August 2015 03:09:14 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Christoph Cullmann wrote:
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the
incoming new bugs,
On Saturday 01 August 2015 01:49:13 Daniel Vrátil wrote:
I like the idea of a nag and I don't think it necesarily conflicts with the
ideas above. Having a weekly/bi-weekly nags to developers would IMO work
(hey, you have 10 new bugs this week that you did not comment on or
confirmed yet,
Christoph Cullmann wrote:
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the
incoming new bugs, might it be a good idea to adopt a similar strategy
like the Qt
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 14:05:09 CEST, laurent Montel wrote:
Especially for KDE PIM, given the size of the userbase and the amount of
developers (3), bugs often take more than a year to get to and
to be fixed.
+1
As Daniel wrote we have a lot of bug and a very small team.
So we can't able
On Friday, July 31, 2015 04:01:37 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 14:05:09 CEST, laurent Montel wrote:
Especially for KDE PIM, given the size of the userbase and the amount of
developers (3), bugs often take more than a year to get to and
to be fixed.
+1
As
On Friday 31 July 2015 12:00:22 Allen Winter wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 04:01:37 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 14:05:09 CEST, laurent Montel wrote:
Especially for KDE PIM, given the size of the userbase and the amount
of
developers (3), bugs often take more
On Friday, July 31, 2015 07:29:53 PM Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Friday 31 July 2015 12:00:22 Allen Winter wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 04:01:37 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 14:05:09 CEST, laurent Montel wrote:
Especially for KDE PIM, given the size of the userbase
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 19:29:53 CEST, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
I also do not see the point in nagging the user after a certain period of
time if nobody else ever cared to comment on the bug. Feels a bit like
little kids asking Are we there yet? over and over again.
The idea is not only to get
Le Friday 31 July 2015, 11:07:54 Daniel Vrátil a écrit :
On Friday, July 31, 2015 10:12:00 AM Christoph Cullmann wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
True that!
As the manpower is limited and we
On Friday, July 31, 2015 09:55:30 PM Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Freitag, 31. Juli 2015 19:29:53 CEST, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
I also do not see the point in nagging the user after a certain period of
time if nobody else ever cared to comment on the bug. Feels a bit like
little kids asking Are we
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Dominik Haumann dhaum...@kde.org wrote:
Of course, some wishes and valid bugs would be automatically closed then,
too.
But this is probably not a big issue, since a wish that will never get
implemented
is useful neither for us as developers nor for the
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Christoph Cullmann
cullm...@absint.com wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the
incoming new bugs,
El Divendres, 31 de juliol de 2015, a les 11:02:44, Dominik Haumann va
escriure:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Christoph Cullmann
cullm...@absint.com wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the incoming
new bugs, might
it be a good idea to adopt a similar strategy like the Qt Project and expire
bugs
On Friday, July 31, 2015 10:12:00 AM Christoph Cullmann wrote:
Hi,
I think one of the problems with our current Bugzilla database is that it
contains a lot of old bugs and wishs.
True that!
As the manpower is limited and we sometimes not even keep up with the
incoming new bugs, might it
On Friday, July 31, 2015 11:02:44 AM Dominik Haumann wrote:
Comments? Strong objections? ;)
+1 - I think it's a sensible strategy and something we kind of implemented
with introducing a new product for Plasma: thus getting rid of the old cruft.
Fun note: I set a bug as RESOLVED FIXED
19 matches
Mail list logo
