Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-21 Thread Vadim Zhukov
2016-07-20 10:29 GMT+03:00 Ben Cooksley : > Hi all, > > Just as a final reminder, i've yet to see responses from: > > - Asplinux BTW, ASPLinux is no more. http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=asp -- WBR, Vadim Zhukov

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-19 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
Hello, El viernes, 8 de julio de 2016 23:39:41 (CEST) Ben Cooksley escribió: > Hi all, > > My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a > distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as > this contains important details. > > First: If you're a

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-09 Thread Michael Palimaka
Hi Ben, On 08/07/16 21:39, Ben Cooksley wrote: > I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please > confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a > general point of contact for that distribution. It would also be > appreciated if folks could check over their

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-09 Thread Eric Hameleers
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as this contains important details. First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-09 Thread Nicolas Lécureuil
Le 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley a écrit : Hi all, My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as this contains important details. First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-09 Thread Philip Muskovac
Hi Ben, for Ubuntu I would be the relevant contact until someone says otherwise and we're very much still there ;) While I'll look at the old keys soon, would it help you if we put a #Contact: at the top of the key list? Or do you have another place where that can be set? Philip Muskovac

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > Hi Ben, Hi Michael, > > On 08/07/16 21:39, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please >> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a >> general point

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Eric Hameleers wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a >> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as >> this contains

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Nicolas Lécureuil wrote: > Le 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley a écrit : >> >> Hi all, >> >> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a >> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as >> this