Giv
en that my change will be accepted, but is it applied. I have not commit
right.
Søndag den 28. september 2014 15:07:51 skrev Søren Holm:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Hi Ian,
Review is to reopened!
I also use Buzilla_token as param for login request.
But use of token as param for attachement works.
Frédéric
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Ian Wadham iandw...@gmail.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
On Sept. 28, 2014, 3:13 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
kdeui/widgets/kmenu.cpp, line 182
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120403/diff/1/?file=315609#file315609line182
try to avoid negated bools unless for performance or readability
reasons (ie. you'd need !flag a lot otherwise)
Hi,
I got this question from Boris, but do not feel qualified to answer,
so forwarding it here. Please CC Boris in reply.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: PVS-Studio KDE analysis
Date: Monday 29 September 2014, 18:04:24
From: Boris Egorov ego...@linux.com
To:
I got this question from Boris, but do not feel qualified to answer,
so forwarding it here. Please CC Boris in reply.
If the report is not separated into components, then I'd guess kde-devel is
the right place for it.
Lets see what the others will say.
A question that I'd have for Boris is
On Monday 29 September 2014 18:55:18 Ivan Čukić wrote:
I got this question from Boris, but do not feel qualified to answer,
so forwarding it here. Please CC Boris in reply.
If the report is not separated into components, then I'd guess
kde-devel is the right place for it.
I think it
On Monday, 29 September 2014 18:39:08 CEST, Christoph Feck wrote:
Russian folks behind PVS-Studio static analyzer
(http://www.viva64.com/en/pvs-studio/) made analysis of KDE project.
Hi, can we make them run it on extragear (and especially
extragear/pim/trojita)?
Cheers,
Jan
--
Trojitá,
Hey Tobias
Some comments about the code -
1. The code seems to be licensed under GPL. In order to make it into a
framework, it will need to be re-licensed. This library seems like an ideal
candidate for becoming a framework.
2. The copyright header seems to say Part of the Digikam Project. You
2014-09-30 3:06 GMT+02:00 Vishesh Handa m...@vhanda.in:
Hey Tobias
Some comments about the code -
1. The code seems to be licensed under GPL. In order to make it into a
framework, it will need to be re-licensed. This library seems like an ideal
candidate for becoming a framework.
libkface
