Sorry Milian, i've sent it to your personal address by mistake.
Resending to the list.
On Monday 20 April 2015 23:02:35 you wrote:
[snip]
Have you notified the Qt WebEngine developers about this? I have not seen
any email in that regard to the official upstream mailing list at
Note that QtQuick Text never uses RichText unless told, AutoText only enables
StyledText when it finds something that looks like a tag before the first line
break.
Originalnachricht
Von: Thomas Lübking
Gesendet: Montag, 20. April 2015 23:27
An: Jeremy Whiting
Cc: kdelibs
Betreff: Re:
El Dimarts, 21 d'abril de 2015, a les 14:02:26, laurent Montel va escriure:
Le Tuesday 14 April 2015 06:46:14 laurent Montel a écrit :
Ok It's in kdereview from the 23 march.
Is it ok to move it ?
Regards
No answer from the 14 april.
So I will ask to move it from kde-review to
On 2015-04-20, Thomas Lübking thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
You can apply that on really *anything* - the obvious (claimed) failure is
Qt breaks somehow Plasma because either
a) a client relied on undocumented behavior (client bug) or
b) a foundation broke documented API/ABI/Behavior
On Monday, April 20, 2015 01:28:59 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
(I am talking with my openSUSE packager hat on as I am the Chromium packager
and am part of the community team that packages KDE/Qt)
It embeds quite a lot of 3rd party stuff which we distros don't accept (in
Hey,
At the moment there is a discussion in kde-core-devel, that distros won't ship
QtWebEngine (at least Debian and Fedora). And ubuntu also will follow the
decision of debian.
The only part so far, that depends on QtWebEngine in kdepim is
KSieveUi::SieveEditorWebView
it only shows links
On Monday 20 April 2015 19:02:40 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Sorry Milian, i've sent it to your personal address by mistake.
Resending to the list.
On Monday 20 April 2015 23:02:35 you wrote:
[snip]
Have you notified the Qt WebEngine developers about this? I have not
On Monday 20 April 2015 23:19:22 Luigi Toscano wrote:
Milian Wolff ha scritto:
I'm not a KDE PIM maintainer, but with my KDevelop hat
on (that uses a web view to display documentation pages, currently
QtWebKit),
kio_man uses khtml (why don't you use it)? But anyway, also khtml is
These are the days I understand why I use gentoo (despite the headaches it
gives me every once in a while). No, I cannot use anything that does not
have chromium, whatever the reason may be, sorry.
Both sides are right, there is not human labour enough to maintain the
stuff, and cutting stuff's
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I know nothing about the trouble w/ QWebEngine¹, but what is insinuated
here is that it's completely unusable, unmaintainable, undistributable
- ie. Qt then simply won't have any full blown web engine, resp. has
one that nobody uses? That issue would seem -a
Le Tuesday 14 April 2015 06:46:14 laurent Montel a écrit :
Ok It's in kdereview from the 23 march.
Is it ok to move it ?
Regards
No answer from the 14 april.
So I will ask to move it from kde-review to kdeutils.
Regards
The thread subject is Deprecating modules with 5.5 on the qt development list.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de wrote:
On Monday 20 April 2015 19:02:40 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Sorry Milian, i've sent it to your personal address by mistake.
Le Tuesday 21 April 2015 19:54:39 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
El Dimarts, 21 d'abril de 2015, a les 14:02:26, laurent Montel va escriure:
Le Tuesday 14 April 2015 06:46:14 laurent Montel a écrit :
Ok It's in kdereview from the 23 march.
Is it ok to move it ?
Regards
No answer
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Scarlett Clark sgcl...@kubuntu.org
wrote:
kaccount-integration:
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/kaccounts-integration%20stable%20stable-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/19/console
There is no kaccounts-integration kde4/qt4 version and should not be.
I've
On Tuesday 21 April 2015 13:45:06 Scarlett Clark wrote:
kdev-crossfire:
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/kdev-crossfire%20master%20stable-qt4/PLATF
ORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/11/
kdev-php-formatter:
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/kdev-php-formatter%20master%20stable-qt4/P
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123458/
---
(Updated April 22, 2015, 12:01 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Software on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123458/
---
(Updated April 22, 2015, 12:06 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Software on
El Dimarts, 21 d'abril de 2015, a les 23:42:36, Milian Wolff va escriure:
On Tuesday 21 April 2015 13:45:06 Scarlett Clark wrote:
kdev-crossfire:
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/kdev-crossfire%20master%20stable-qt4/PLA
TF ORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/11/
kdev-php-formatter:
I know this is an external depend, but I have no experience with it.
Can maybe a calligra dev take a look, as they need it.
VC
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/vc%20master%20stable-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/2/console
With that said:
Calligra: (probably vc)
On April 22, 2015, 12:40 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
I think this should go to Qt (I think it's quite difficult they will accept
it, as Qt4 is in hard freeze mode), and they will probably ask to see if it
applies to Qt5 as well.
We just mirror Qt... not sure how to handle this.
Yes, I
On April 21, 2015, 10:40 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
I think this should go to Qt (I think it's quite difficult they will accept
it, as Qt4 is in hard freeze mode), and they will probably ask to see if it
applies to Qt5 as well.
We just mirror Qt... not sure how to handle this.
On April 22, 2015, 12:40 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
I think this should go to Qt (I think it's quite difficult they will accept
it, as Qt4 is in hard freeze mode), and they will probably ask to see if it
applies to Qt5 as well.
We just mirror Qt... not sure how to handle this.
Of course my previous email those that failed in stable failed here too.
A big thank you to those that got fixed.
latest compile failures:
apper:
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/apper%20master%20latest-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/24/console
choqok:
This is likely because qoauth installs
On 04/21/2015 03:08 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Dimarts, 21 d'abril de 2015, a les 23:42:36, Milian Wolff va escriure:
On Tuesday 21 April 2015 13:45:06 Scarlett Clark wrote:
kdev-crossfire:
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/kdev-crossfire%20master%20stable-qt4/PLA
TF
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123458/#review79313
---
I think this should go to Qt (I think it's quite difficult
On April 22, 2015, 12:40 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
I think this should go to Qt (I think it's quite difficult they will accept
it, as Qt4 is in hard freeze mode), and they will probably ask to see if it
applies to Qt5 as well.
We just mirror Qt... not sure how to handle this.
On 04/20/2015 08:17 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
IMHO the duty of a distro is providing software to their users to use
But not under any circumstance: Enforcing some level of hygiene and
quality in the software provided is a service rendered in my interest
and protects me as a user. A lot of
Raymond Wooninck wrote:
Isn't this the real main issue with the new QtWebEngine and Chromium
itself ?? In the past I have been trying to get Chromium to build using
system version of the 3rd party stuff, but this only worked out for some
of them. Google didn't just included the 3rd party
On Tuesday 21 April 2015 15:44:35 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Thomas Lübking wrote:
I know nothing about the trouble w/ QWebEngine¹, but what is insinuated
here is that it's completely unusable, unmaintainable, undistributable
- ie. Qt then simply won't have any full blown web engine,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123458/
---
Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X and Qt KDE.
Repository: qt
On 04/21/2015 02:42 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2015 13:45:06 Scarlett Clark wrote:
kdev-crossfire:
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/kdev-crossfire%20master%20stable-qt4/PLATF
ORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/11/
kdev-php-formatter:
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Actually when it comes to the web engine it's not true. When I suggested
to use an external ffmpeg and libv8 (javascript engine) the answer was
directly no, simply because they are too entangled to be possible. And
ffmpeg tends to be quite a source of
Milian Wolff wrote:
When did this take place and what is the threads subject? I seem to have
missed it, and also can't find it in my recent mails. Sorry for that.
It was a subthread starting here:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2015-February/019900.html
(It also overflowed
33 matches
Mail list logo
