Re: Review Request: Rebuild fake locale as soon as possible

2011-06-06 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101509/#review3714 --- This review has been submitted with commit

Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, I am requesting that a moratorium on dependency bumps for dependencies which are hard to build be enacted. This would affect system wide components which rely on root access and are heavily integrated into the system. This would not affect things such as UPower or the like - which aren't

Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Monday 06 June 2011 23:05:52 Ben Cooksley wrote: Hi all, I am requesting that a moratorium on dependency bumps for dependencies which are hard to build be enacted. This would affect system wide components which rely on root access and are heavily integrated into the system. This would

Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 6 de June de 2011 17:48:41 Martin Gräßlin wrote: Personal opinion: I think it is impossible to want to run the latest software around an old stack. The overall FOSS world is rolling release with everything depending on everything. I cannot see why you want to change that with a

Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Tuesday, June 7, 2011 06:19:52 Ben Cooksley wrote: The Moratorium would extend to all components of the KDE SC distribution. Hence kde-core-devel. imho this is impossible, for the reasons Martin noted. The components affected by the Moratorium - namely the Kernel, X and ALSA interfaces

Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: On Tuesday, June 7, 2011 06:19:52 Ben Cooksley wrote: The Moratorium would extend to all components of the KDE SC distribution. Hence kde-core-devel. imho this is impossible, for the reasons Martin noted. The components

Re: Review Request: Fix possible memory and D-Bus connection leak in KStatusNotifierItem

2011-06-06 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101527/#review3726 --- i doubt this fix is correct. what looks more like is

Re: [Kde-bindings] Modularization and other languages' bindings (was: The Future of our Frameworks)

2011-06-06 Thread Richard Dale
On Monday, June 06, 2011 08:05:41 PM Luca Beltrame wrote: In data Monday 06 June 2011 19:26:38, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto: (I took the liberty of adding kde-bindings to the CC of tihs specific topic) We want to make it possible to use our frameworks in Qt projects without

Re: Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: On Tuesday 07 June 2011 08:29:51 Ben Cooksley wrote: Next KWin. It currently depends upon Mesa 7.10. I have a local revert in a private local branch which reverts the dependency check code within KWin to continue to allow

Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday, June 06, 2011 05:48:41 PM Martin Gräßlin wrote: ... Personal opinion: I think it is impossible to want to run the latest software around an old stack. The overall FOSS world is rolling release with everything depending on everything. You cannot say it like that. It depends always on

Re: [Kde-bindings] Re: Modularization and other languages' bindings (was: The Future of our Frameworks)

2011-06-06 Thread Richard Dale
On Monday, June 06, 2011 09:41:43 PM Richard Dale wrote: I started another QtScript bindings project called 'JSmoke' which is currently stalled because of technical problems with QtScript which got even worse moving from Qt 4.5 to 4.6. That did cover both the Qt and KDE apis, and I really

Re: Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Maksim Orlovich
Please also note that I will add a runtime requirement to Mesa 7.11 as I have here on my system the start of the Wayland port which will be in 4.8 and requires Mesa 7.11. Why would wayland support have any effect on runtime dependency on X11?

Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Thomas Lübking
Am Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:08:24 -0400 schrieb Maksim Orlovich m...@cornell.edu: Why would wayland support have any effect on runtime dependency on X11? http://groups.google.com/group/wayland-display-server/web/building-and-running-wayland Building mesa Wayland uses the mesa EGL stack, and all

Intended organization of KDE Frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello lists, disclaimer As, Sebas pointed out we've been meeting here to work on plans to improve our frameworks offering leading to the decision of leaving the current kdelibs model behind and prepare for a more modular suite named KDE Frameworks. If you didn't read his email yet, please do

Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Thomas Lübking
Am Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:51:26 +1200 schrieb Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org: You are effectively classifying a distribution No, distribution version vanilla - iff at all. (You still can develop on master, even run kwin - just not use OpenGL composited kwin from master then - that's not quite the

Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Thomas Lübking
Am Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:33:28 -0400 schrieb Maksim Orlovich m...@cornell.edu: Sorry, my wording was poor: Might have been my reading as well. Your original question could have perfectly been read like the clarified one. OK, wayland needs recent Mesa at runtime, but I am not running Wayland; so

Re: Releases of the thing that was KDE

2011-06-06 Thread John Layt
On 6 June 2011 23:36, Scott Kitterman k...@kitterman.com wrote: I get we need to modularize for a number of important reasons, but I don't see the companion story for how this all gets released as something coherent and functional. Where's that part of the story? Scott K From Sebas'

Rules to be approved as part of KDE Frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello lists, disclaimer As, Sebas pointed out we've been meeting here to work on plans to improve our frameworks offering leading to the decision of leaving the current kdelibs model behind and prepare for a more modular suite named KDE Frameworks. If you didn't read his email yet, please do

Re: Intended organization of KDE Frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 7 June 2011 00:17:23 Albert Astals Cid wrote: A Monday, June 06, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure: Hello lists, Throughout this example we will refer to the following graph: http://files.kde.org/ervin/platform11/kde-frameworks-dependencies-plan.pd f Shall i read from this

Re: Intended organization of KDE Frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 7 June 2011 01:26:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote: A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure: Well, obviously a Tier 1 framework would have to use tr() instead of i18n() for its translation needs. Are we still going to use .po or you plan on us moving to Qt translation

Re: Rules to be approved as part of KDE Frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Maksim Orlovich
* all new features will be developed using the recommended git workflow (pending publication; Cornelius is working on that one); Those rules might seem like a strong departure from what we're used to. On the other hand, if you look at them closely, they are merely making explicit changes to

Re: Rules to be approved as part of KDE Frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Monday, June 6, 2011 19:41:15 Maksim Orlovich wrote: * all new features will be developed using the recommended git workflow (pending publication; Cornelius is working on that one); Those rules might seem like a strong departure from what we're used to. On the other hand, if

Re: Releases of the thing that was KDE

2011-06-06 Thread Nicolas Alvarez
Scott Kitterman wrote: New thread as requested. I've been told on IRC that we will still have an integrated release of what used to be KDE (I've no clue what to call it now since I think I read KDE SC was deprecated). All I see in the messaging from the platform sprint seems to be about

Re: Review Request: Fix possible memory and D-Bus connection leak in KStatusNotifierItem

2011-06-06 Thread Shaun Reich
On June 6, 2011, 8:38 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote: i doubt this fix is correct. what looks more like is KStatusNotifierItemDBus::~KStatusNotifierItemDBus(). right now this is the implementation: m_dbus.unregisterService(m_service); and perhaps it should include:

Review Request: Fix global shortcuts that needs shift key, like for example ctrl+% (ctrl+shift+5 on many keyboards)

2011-06-06 Thread Simon Persson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101520/ --- Review request for KDE Runtime and Michael Jansen. Summary ---

Re: Review Request: KMainWindow::parseGeometry() fails to position with positive coordinates

2011-06-06 Thread Urban Widmark
On June 6, 2011, 2:04 a.m., David Faure wrote: Looks good overall, but I think I found a bug with negative coordinates: konqueror --geometry +500-100 gives me a window that xwininfo says is at 744x533+500-29, which doesn't match. I have no experience with this, but it seems to me

Re: Review Request: Fix possible memory and D-Bus connection leak in KStatusNotifierItem

2011-06-06 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
On June 6, 2011, 8:38 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote: i doubt this fix is correct. what looks more like is KStatusNotifierItemDBus::~KStatusNotifierItemDBus(). right now this is the implementation: m_dbus.unregisterService(m_service); and perhaps it should include:

Re: Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

2011-06-06 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: - Ursprüngliche Mitteilung - On 6/6/11, Thomas Lübking thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote: Am Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:08:24 -0400 schrieb Maksim Orlovich m...@cornell.edu: Why would wayland support have any effect

Re: Communication between C++ and QML

2011-06-06 Thread David Edmundson
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Stefan Majewsky stefan.majew...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I've been looking into QML again for kdegames. Some background: I added a QDeclarativeImageProvider to feed images from libtagaro's ThemeProvider into QML, and that mostly works (with an emphasis on

The Future of our Frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Hi all, You've probably been aware that a rather sizable group of KDE developers and stakeholders in our development platform is meeting in Randa, Switzerland to discuss the future of our development frameworks, with the big topic being modularization of kdelibs. We've had a number of great

error building kde/kanagram from master

2011-06-06 Thread
Error building kde/kanagram from master, the output: [ 22%] Building CXX object kanagram/src/CMakeFiles/kanagram.dir/kanagram.o /home/mmodem/rpm/BUILD/kdeedu/kanagram/src/kanagram.cpp:49:30: fatal error: sharedkvtmlfiles.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[2]: ***

Re: error building kde/kanagram from master

2011-06-06 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
Le Monday 6 June 2011 19:35:53, Zé a écrit : Error building kde/kanagram from master, the output: [ 22%] Building CXX object kanagram/src/CMakeFiles/kanagram.dir/kanagram.o /home/mmodem/rpm/BUILD/kdeedu/kanagram/src/kanagram.cpp:49:30: fatal error: sharedkvtmlfiles.h: No such file or

Re: [Kde-bindings] Modularization and other languages' bindings (was: The Future of our Frameworks)

2011-06-06 Thread Richard Dale
On Monday, June 06, 2011 08:05:41 PM Luca Beltrame wrote: In data Monday 06 June 2011 19:26:38, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto: (I took the liberty of adding kde-bindings to the CC of tihs specific topic) We want to make it possible to use our frameworks in Qt projects without

Re: [Kde-bindings] Re: Modularization and other languages' bindings (was: The Future of our Frameworks)

2011-06-06 Thread Richard Dale
On Monday, June 06, 2011 09:41:43 PM Richard Dale wrote: I started another QtScript bindings project called 'JSmoke' which is currently stalled because of technical problems with QtScript which got even worse moving from Qt 4.5 to 4.6. That did cover both the Qt and KDE apis, and I really

Re: Releases of the thing that was KDE

2011-06-06 Thread Brad Hards
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:36:52 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: The results on the platform sprint read like more chaos is coming. I get we need to modularize for a number of important reasons, but I don't see the companion story for how this all gets released as something coherent and functional.

Modularization and other languages' bindings (was: The Future of our Frameworks)

2011-06-06 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data Monday 06 June 2011 19:26:38, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto: (I took the liberty of adding kde-bindings to the CC of tihs specific topic) We want to make it possible to use our frameworks in Qt projects without significant additional dependencies. This means: Reading around the plans

Intended organization of KDE Frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello lists, disclaimer As, Sebas pointed out we've been meeting here to work on plans to improve our frameworks offering leading to the decision of leaving the current kdelibs model behind and prepare for a more modular suite named KDE Frameworks. If you didn't read his email yet, please do

Rules to be approved as part of KDE Frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello lists, disclaimer As, Sebas pointed out we've been meeting here to work on plans to improve our frameworks offering leading to the decision of leaving the current kdelibs model behind and prepare for a more modular suite named KDE Frameworks. If you didn't read his email yet, please do

Re: Releases of the thing that was KDE

2011-06-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
John Layt johnl...@googlemail.com wrote: On 6 June 2011 23:36, Scott Kitterman k...@kitterman.com wrote: I get we need to modularize for a number of important reasons, but I don't see the companion story for how this all gets released as something coherent and functional. Where's that

Re: The Future of our Frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Tuesday, June 7, 2011 00:51:12 todd rme wrote: As for new threads, are you looking for suggestions and ideas or only questions at this point? we're looking for feedback on the topics that are presented in these emails (there are a few others that have already been sent, and some that will

Re: Releases of the thing that was KDE

2011-06-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
Nicolas Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com wrote: Scott Kitterman wrote: New thread as requested. I've been told on IRC that we will still have an integrated release of what used to be KDE (I've no clue what to call it now since I think I read KDE SC was deprecated). All I see in the

Accessing CMake Environment Variables From Program

2011-06-06 Thread Brian Helm
Okay, I feel like this should be a very simple thing to accomplish. However, I can't seem to figure out how to do it. In my CMakeLists.txt file I have the following lines to install images: install(FILES images/close.svgz DESTINATION