---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105867/#review16877
---
Thanks for looking at the Windows build of KDE Frameworks!
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105868/#review16878
---
Ship it!
Ah, yes, this is a porting error. KDE4 cmake stuff
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105863/#review16879
---
tier2/kconfig/CMakeLists.txt
On Saturday 04 August 2012 09:41:28 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Saturday 04 August 2012 00:52:16 David Faure wrote:
On Friday 03 August 2012 13:57:54 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
Hey David,
I started taking a stab at the KApplication - QApplication
fix/conversions, then pulled and can't build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105860/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2012, 9:22 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On Aug. 5, 2012, 9:12 a.m., David Faure wrote:
tier2/kconfig/CMakeLists.txt, line 7
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105863/diff/1/?file=76038#file76038line7
Ah, damn, there are conflicting goals here.
We removed ${CMAKE_MODULE_PATH} on purpose so that each framework
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105866/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2012, 9:43 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
I think I mistakenly started building master branch somehow which put
a bunch of generated files in my source tree. I think what he meant
to document in the wiki was the way to find out if /usr/include
headers were mistakenly being found (make VERBOSE=1) but since that's
not supposed to happen,
On Aug. 5, 2012, 9:12 a.m., David Faure wrote:
tier2/kconfig/CMakeLists.txt, line 7
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105863/diff/1/?file=76038#file76038line7
Ah, damn, there are conflicting goals here.
We removed ${CMAKE_MODULE_PATH} on purpose so that each framework
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105866/#review16896
---
Where have you seen this ?
CMake 2.8.8 does not, and 2.8.9 has
Hi,
What is the policy on moving FindFoo.cmake files from frameworks to
ECM or upstream. In particular, I have found the following ones still
existing in the various tier1 and tier2 migrated frameworks:
kcoreaddons
--FindFAM.cmake
kidletime
--FindX11.cmake
--FindX11XCB.cmake
--FindXCB.cmake
11 matches
Mail list logo