---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112532/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Description
---
This change
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112527/#review39394
---
staging/kemoticons/src/providers/adium/adium_emoticons.cpp
On Wednesday 04 September 2013 18:39:57 Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
porting a couple of kio slaves (trying to make sense of the trash kio partly
ported to kf5 in a gsoc) i noticed what appears to be a slight behavior
change compared to when it used KUrl
something like this in kde4 was
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1155/changes
Changes:
[faure] Document another KUrl-QUrl porting trap.
--
[...truncated 14319 lines...]
from
On Thursday 05 September 2013, David Faure wrote:
See, you even knew that ;)
what should be done? modify kio to make qurls without scheme work (and
assume they are file://) or modify all the users to make sure a scheme is
always passed?
Correct porting to QUrl is the only thing that
On Sept. 1, 2013, 10:11 a.m., David Faure wrote:
Testing that it compiles isn't enough, please test that the unittests still
pass. :)
Too bad I can't find a test for this precise feature, but at least it would
be good to check that nothing regresses.
Just checked tests do pass and
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1156/changes
Changes:
[agateau] Port KJob to QEventLoopLocker
--
[...truncated 14317 lines...]
from
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112536/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Description
---
I had to tell it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112536/#review39417
---
Before you move kunitconversion, please add the necessary
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112536/
---
(Updated Sept. 5, 2013, 3:17 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
See http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_frameworks_qt5/1157/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112536/#review39421
---
Ship it!
This is fine, thanks. Please add the cmake related
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112536/
---
(Updated Sept. 5, 2013, 3:05 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
On Thursday 05 September 2013 16:40:48 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Aleix Pol wrote:
Git commit 25c6f2501ba077ef6f566dac3f12fc766ff5b4ab by Aleix Pol.
Committed on 05/09/2013 at 14:36.
Pushed by apol into branch 'frameworks'.
meinproc5.shell doesn't exist anymore since now it doesn't use
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112545/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Albert Astals Cid.
Description
Hi,
KCompletion now depends on KNotification, I'd suggest to remove that
dependency (I can do it myself).
At the moment it's generating quite a bit of DBus noise even though it's
not being consumed anywhere I could find.
It's used both in KHistoryBox and KCompletion. If you want to test it, you
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 05 September 2013 16:40:48 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Aleix Pol wrote:
Git commit 25c6f2501ba077ef6f566dac3f12fc766ff5b4ab by Aleix Pol.
Committed on 05/09/2013 at 14:36.
Pushed by apol into branch 'frameworks'.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112536/#review39426
---
This review has been submitted with commit
Hi!
Today I couldn't compile KF5 with the following message from cmake:
--
CMake Warning at staging/kdoctools/src/CMakeLists.txt:27 (find_package):
By not providing FindDocBookXML.cmake in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this project
has asked CMake to find a
I answer myself (thanks to the info given by sebas through irc):
If it happens to you, please delete the build dir (at least the e-c-m one)
update e-c-m and rebuild.
Cheers!
David Gil
2013/9/5 David Gil Oliva davidgilol...@gmail.com
Hi!
Today I couldn't compile KF5 with the following
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112527/
---
(Updated Sept. 5, 2013, 9:02 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
On Sept. 1, 2013, 5:16 p.m., David Faure wrote:
Looks fine to me.
I don't agree with this patch. I didn't get any notification about this. So I
very ask you before do any changes in cmake rules talk with me. It is important
for me.
- Ivan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112547/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Description
---
It happens that
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:32 PM, David Gil Oliva davidgilol...@gmail.comwrote:
I answer myself (thanks to the info given by sebas through irc):
If it happens to you, please delete the build dir (at least the e-c-m one)
update e-c-m and rebuild.
Cheers!
David Gil
2013/9/5 David Gil
See http://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework_master_qt5/692/changes
Changes:
[kde] Add KBookmarks to list of needed modules to fix build
--
Started by remote host 2a01:4f8:160:9363::9 with note: Triggered by commit
Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 3 in
25 matches
Mail list logo
