On Oct. 16, 2013, 12:15 p.m., John Layt wrote:
Wow, there sure is a lot of code in there catering for all the possible
corner cases :-) QTimeZone has a lot less places it checks, so I'll need
to do an in-depth comparison, but given Qt5 will only support modern
distros I think most
Mark wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:42 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday 13 October 2013 17:18:28 Mark wrote:
Hi,
I used to rely on KF5_INCLUDE_DIRS but since a few days that variable
seems to be empty. Did i do something wrong?
My CMake file for the relevant parts:
Mark wrote:
Step 2: Create a Qt 5.2 project. CMake or QMake, doesn't matter. it
needs kdelibs, kio and qt widgets and whatever the extra dependencies
are at this moment. You can use this cmake file for reference
http://pastebin.kde.org/ptq5kgkqx. Change the absolute paths. The code
for you
Hi all,
Since we are now sharing the locations of our configs with non-kde software,
we can potentially get collisions with those.
I'm proposing changing the names of the config files to org.kde.something
(or some other alternative).
Cheerio,
Ivan
--
Acting is merely the art of keeping a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113148/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 10:22 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
On Oct. 20, 2013, 9:32 a.m., David Faure wrote:
OK, I'm just wondering if it still makes sense to make it
static-methods-only.
It can still very well work the other way, which can allow extra
flexibility if needed (e.g. for kate to add another widget into it, or use
it non-modal,
On Sept. 23, 2013, 9:10 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
Any news about that patch? Hasn't seen activity in a while, it probably
doesn't apply cleanly anymore.
Still no news?
If I don't see activity by next monday I'll close it as discarded.
- Kevin
On Sept. 23, 2013, 9:12 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
Any reason why this patch isn't committed yet? Please do so ASAP.
Any news?
I'll close it as discarded if I don't see any activity by next monday.
- Kevin
---
This is an
On Aug. 31, 2013, 7:11 a.m., David Faure wrote:
I disagree. Making things slow to cover a really really corner case (mixing
kde4 and kde5), while the solution already exists (clearing the cache when
switching icon themes), doesn't seem very sensible to me.
The point is really that
Hi all,
Following kde-workspace (and stealing a few sentences from that announcement),
we're planning to merge the frameworks-scratch branch of kactivities into
master later today. That means if you're building 4.x branch of Plasma
yourself from Git, you should switch to the
KDE/4.11 branch.
On Sept. 26, 2013, 2:27 a.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
I'm just going to point out something I know you already know since we've
discussed it many times;
that an xcb port of the NETWM classes already exists in a branch.
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
my aim was to write the unit test and
On Sept. 23, 2013, 10:07 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
Tested the patch in my tree, works for caps lock too.
Now it highlights a dependency problem... We don't want a dependency on
QX11Extras from KGuiAddons. So maybe we should move KModifierKeyInfo to
your proposed KX11Extras?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113155/#review42070
---
Any chance to see Alexander comments addressed?
- Kevin
On Oct. 11, 2013, 4:28 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
Ship It!
Any reason why this patch is not pushed yet?
- Kevin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112985/#review41567
On Oct. 20, 2013, 9:32 a.m., David Faure wrote:
OK, I'm just wondering if it still makes sense to make it
static-methods-only.
It can still very well work the other way, which can allow extra
flexibility if needed (e.g. for kate to add another widget into it, or use
it non-modal,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113266/#review42074
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Oct. 16, 2013, 1:35
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113297/#review42076
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Oct. 17, 2013, 12:08
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113181/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 11:30 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113181/#review42075
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113299/#review42077
---
I would leave them alone for now. I think we'll revisit the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113298/#review42078
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Oct. 17, 2013, 7:53
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113329/#review42079
---
Ship it!
Preemptively giving this one a ship it. Can go in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113258/#review42081
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Oct. 15, 2013, 6:43
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113328/#review42080
---
tier2/kdoctools/CMakeLists.txt
On Oct. 20, 2013, 9:32 a.m., David Faure wrote:
OK, I'm just wondering if it still makes sense to make it
static-methods-only.
It can still very well work the other way, which can allow extra
flexibility if needed (e.g. for kate to add another widget into it, or use
it non-modal,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113148/#review42083
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kevin Ottens
On Oct. 21, 2013, 10:22
Please no. We have a 4.12 release to make in 2 weeks and back when we did
the 4.12 planning the only agreed repo to be freezed for 4.11 was
kde-workspace.
What about doing an early KDE/4.12 branch from master so that the release can
continue as planned, while not slowing us down for further
On Oct. 20, 2013, 9:32 a.m., David Faure wrote:
OK, I'm just wondering if it still makes sense to make it
static-methods-only.
It can still very well work the other way, which can allow extra
flexibility if needed (e.g. for kate to add another widget into it, or use
it non-modal,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113302/#review42085
---
Ship it!
I think it's OK to keep it based only on statics. As
On Oct. 21, 2013, 12:05 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
I think it's OK to keep it based only on statics. As such we can go for it.
OK, let's go for static methods only then.
- David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
On Oct. 16, 2013, 12:15 p.m., John Layt wrote:
Wow, there sure is a lot of code in there catering for all the possible
corner cases :-) QTimeZone has a lot less places it checks, so I'll need
to do an in-depth comparison, but given Qt5 will only support modern
distros I think most
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113365/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Klapetek.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113302/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 12:40 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
Git commit 5e9404239fb974973e8a253444131884954ede77 by Stephen Kelly.
Committed on 21/10/2013 at 12:49.
Pushed by skelly into branch 'frameworks'.
Add include/KDE to users of KIOCore.
Note that this really only hides the problem. There are several problems
with the KF5 includes, and several
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113328/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 3:32 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
On Oct. 21, 2013, 1:43 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
tier2/kdoctools/CMakeLists.txt, line 18
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113328/diff/2/?file=203416#file203416line18
FOOBAR really? :-)
In fact ecm_setup_version might not even be needed for that one, it has
no lib,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113148/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 2:09 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113148/#review42095
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Oct. 9, 2013, 6:39 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
Any news about that patch? It hasn't seen activity lately.
Kevin Ottens wrote:
Anybody home?
FYI I'll close it as discarded if it doesn't have any activity by next
monday.
hey, I'm going to pick it up again! Just had been
Hey everyone
I managed to contact Sebastian through his kdab email account. I've
attached the response below.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Sebastian Sauer
sebastian.sa...@kdab.com wrote:
On 10/16/2013 03:15 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
Hey Sebastian
Aloha Vishesh :)
If you get some free
Aloha Sebastian :D
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Sebastian Sauer
sebastian.sa...@kdab.com wrote:
Aloha Vishesh :)
Unfortunately I don't have a working kf5 setup, there are no packages for my
distribution and keeping up with kf5 development is near impossible for me
having a fulltime-job
kinit needs kservice and installs KInitMacros.cmake which defines
kf5_add_kdeinit_executable which is needed by kservice/kbuildsycoca
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108845/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 3:23 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108845/#review42107
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Monday 21 October 2013 17:01:44 Treeve Jelbert wrote:
kinit needs kservice and installs KInitMacros.cmake which defines
kf5_add_kdeinit_executable which is needed by kservice/kbuildsycoca
Well, spotted, missed that one in the review. Alex could you look into solving
this cycle? Thanks in
Hi all,
Following kde-workspace (and stealing a few sentences from that
announcement),
we're planning to merge the frameworks-scratch branch of kactivities into
master later today. That means if you're building 4.x branch of Plasma
yourself from Git, you should switch to the
KDE/4.11
El Dilluns, 21 d'octubre de 2013, a les 14:02:42, Ivan Čukić va escriure:
Please no. We have a 4.12 release to make in 2 weeks and back when we did
the 4.12 planning the only agreed repo to be freezed for 4.11 was
kde-workspace.
What about doing an early KDE/4.12 branch from master so
I was planning to branch master into KDE/4.12 after October 30 and
before November 6.
Forget about it. Decided not to create problems - I'll use the same name
for the branch as kdelibs do for the time being - frameworks :)
Also it means that you don't want a 4.13.x for kactivities, right?
El Dilluns, 21 d'octubre de 2013, a les 18:43:20, Ivan Čukić va escriure:
I was planning to branch master into KDE/4.12 after October 30 and
before November 6.
Forget about it. Decided not to create problems - I'll use the same name
for the branch as kdelibs do for the time being -
Well, to be honest, if you don't want a 4.13 release i'd prefer you actually
use master for KF5. Otherwise people might random-commit fixes to master
and then wonder why they never got into a release, so the two situations i
think make sense are:
People don't really contribute to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113365/#review42119
---
Ship it!
Looks sane, and builds fine even when I remove the
On Monday 21 October 2013, Ivan Čukić wrote:
Hi all,
Since we are now sharing the locations of our configs with non-kde
software, we can potentially get collisions with those.
I'm proposing changing the names of the config files to org.kde.something
(or some other alternative).
do you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113258/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 6:25 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113258/#review42122
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
Git commit 5e9404239fb974973e8a253444131884954ede77 by Stephen Kelly.
Committed on 21/10/2013 at 12:49.
Pushed by skelly into branch 'frameworks'.
Add include/KDE to users of KIOCore.
Note that this really only hides
do you mean the Config.cmake files or application configuration files ?
The application configuration files.
Ivan
--
When the pupil is ready to learn, a teacher will appear.
-- Basho
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113373/
---
Review request for Extra Cmake Modules, KDE Frameworks and Stephen Kelly.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113373/#review42126
---
As the next CMake release will have a better solution which
On Oct. 21, 2013, 7:18 p.m., Stephen Kelly wrote:
As the next CMake release will have a better solution which works for all
compilers:
set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 11)
I'm not in favor of adding and having to support this flag.
I don't consider it my decision though.
Are we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113373/#review42130
---
As far as I know, only threadweaver and karchive will be
See http://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework_master_qt5/825/changes
Changes:
[notmart] get rid of WidgetExplorerView
--
[...truncated 326 lines...]
Generating moc_storagetest.cpp
Generating mouseeventlistener.moc
See http://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework_master_qt5/826/changes
Changes:
[notmart] use the ctivity class and Kactivities
[notmart] make activity switching work
[notmart] link to KF5::KActivities
[notmart] activity switching animation
[notmart] a toggleActivityManager action
See http://build.kde.org/job/plasma-framework_master_qt5/827/changes
Changes:
[aleixpol] Stop using Qt5Transitional in Plasma Frameworks
--
Started by remote host 127.0.0.1 with note: Triggered by commit
Building remotely on LinuxSlave - 3 in workspace
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113298/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 10:30 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113299/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 7:31 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113297/#review42139
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113297/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 11:02 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113377/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Stephen Kelly.
Repository:
2013/10/21 Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113377/
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Stephen Kelly.
By Sebastian Kügler.
Repository: extra-cmake-modules
Description
Add KDeclarative to known
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113378/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113376/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
On Oct. 11, 2013, 4:28 p.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
Ship It!
Kevin Ottens wrote:
Any reason why this patch isn't pushed yet?
Yes. There are some personal reasons and, besides, I've been trying for days to
compile Qt5.2 with no luck till today. I think I'll have both patches pushed
Hi all,
It seems that plasma-framework (a dependency of kde-workspace master) has
now added a dependency on kactivities. However kactivities itself depends
on nepomuk-core and soprano - and there is no frameworks / Qt 5 branch for
either of those.
How do we proceed here?
I'd appreciate it if
73 matches
Mail list logo
