Re: Review Request 113805: Do not change the build types available with cmake

2013-11-16 Thread Alexander Neundorf
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113805/#review43836 --- The patch does not change the documentation and the CMAKE_BUILD

Re: Review Request 113805: Do not change the build types available with cmake

2013-11-16 Thread Alexander Neundorf
> On Nov. 12, 2013, 7:24 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > IMO the patch as it is is not good. > > > > Several things: > > 1) This file, is not mandatory at all with KDE frameworks. > > You can build applications using KDE frameworks libraries without it. You > > (the developer of the applica

Re: Review Request 113805: Do not change the build types available with cmake

2013-11-16 Thread Alexander Neundorf
> On Nov. 12, 2013, 7:24 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > IMO the patch as it is is not good. > > > > Several things: > > 1) This file, is not mandatory at all with KDE frameworks. > > You can build applications using KDE frameworks libraries without it. You > > (the developer of the applica

Dot story on KDE contributions to Qt 5.2

2013-11-16 Thread John Layt
Hi, There was a discussion on the promo list a couple of weeks back about doing a Dot story to coincide with the release of Qt 5.2 highlighting KDE's contributions. Jos started an Etherpad at https://notes.kde.org/p/Platform5DotStoryForQt52 for notes on this story. If you've made a contribution

KMediaPlayer

2013-11-16 Thread Alex Merry
Since getting KMediaPlayer into a tier is relatively urgent, given Kevin's plan to split the repo next week, I thought I'd just let people know that I won't be able to do anything on it until at least Monday afternoon. So if anyone wants to work on it, you won't be duplicating/interfering with my