On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:21 AM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
[resent with Frederik's correct email address]
On Thursday 06 February 2014 00:53:53 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
Thanks a lot, I really appreciate it.
Some issues left:
- who do we write down as maintainer for attica?
- can I
Hi all,
Just to let everyone know, I'm taking over the role of maintainer for both
KConfig and KDNSSD. I'm most contactable at this email address (
matt...@mjdsystems.ca ). I'm usually idling on IRC with a nick of MJD, but
I'm not always watching IRC.
I'll do my best to watch over the
Hi frameworkers,
I just did the ultimate test of running Kate on Wayland (Weston) [1] and
noticed that our integration plugin seems not to get picked. At least Oxygen
is not used as the widget style and icons in menus are missing, etc. See
screenshot in [2].
Does anyone have an idea why that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115459/
---
(Updated Feb. 6, 2014, 10:19 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
Hello,
On Thursday 06 February 2014 09:37:39 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Does anyone have an idea why that might be the case and how to properly
investigate this?
Guessing: Does the platform plugin for wayland reimplement
QPlatformIntegration::themeNames()? Ideally it should provide the same list
On Thursday 06 February 2014 10:40:06 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday 06 February 2014 09:37:39 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Does anyone have an idea why that might be the case and how to properly
investigate this?
Guessing: Does the platform plugin for wayland reimplement
On Feb. 5, 2014, 3:51 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Wow, great work! I attempted doing this some time ago, and all I managed to
produce was two unit tests :). Looks good to me and works fine here. Just
two (really minor) nitpicks.
Kevin Krammer wrote:
Thanks :)
Good to hear
Martin GräßlinOn Thursday 06 February 2014 10:49:36 wrote:
On Thursday 06 February 2014 10:40:06 Kevin Ottens wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday 06 February 2014 09:37:39 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Does anyone have an idea why that might be the case and how to properly
investigate this?
Martin GräßlinOn Thursday 06 February 2014 10:54:42 wrote:
Yes, fixes it with the result that app crashes on startup, because Oxygen
uses xcb unconditionally.
/me goes fixing Oxygen :-)
and the screenshot of Kate with Oxygen on Wayland:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:21 PM, David Edmundson
da...@davidedmundson.co.uk wrote:
There is an existing page about slitting runtime here:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/New_Runtime_Organization
linked to from
On Feb. 5, 2014, 6:52 p.m., Michael Palimaka wrote:
CMakeLists.txt, lines 28-30
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115504/diff/1/?file=242131#file242131line28
Curious, what's the advantage to having a new variable vs. checking
Qt5PrintSupport_FOUND later?
Well, the relationship
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115502/
---
(Updated Feb. 6, 2014, 12:05 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115502/#review49110
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115459/#review49113
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alexander Richardson
On Feb. 6, 2014,
On Feb. 6, 2014, 2:14 a.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
src/kwindowsystem.cpp, line 342
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115459/diff/2-3/?file=242085#file242085line342
The non-MSVC macro has a return statement, I think this one needs it as
well
Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115495/#review49120
---
Instant issue: the README.md claims that yapgvb is only
On Feb. 6, 2014, 1:56 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
Instant issue: the README.md claims that yapgvb is only needed to generate
the diagrams, but not having it installed causes kgenframeworksapidocs to
fail with an ImportError (it imports depdiagram, which imports yapgvb).
You need to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115517/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
Repository: kio
On Feb. 6, 2014, 12:56 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
Instant issue: the README.md claims that yapgvb is only needed to generate
the diagrams, but not having it installed causes kgenframeworksapidocs to
fail with an ImportError (it imports depdiagram, which imports yapgvb).
You need to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115517/#review49126
---
I think the tests would make more sense at the calling sites.
On Feb. 5, 2014, 11:58 a.m., Alex Merry wrote:
tests/CMakeLists.txt, lines 7-20
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115481/diff/2/?file=241988#file241988line7
These should all be PURPOSE, not DESCRIPTION. Also, Qt5Test should
have its PURPOSE set as well.
Michael Palimaka
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115517/
---
(Updated Feb. 6, 2014, 2:37 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115517/#review49128
---
Ship it!
OK, that works.
- Alex Merry
On Feb. 6, 2014,
On Feb. 6, 2014, 1:56 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
Instant issue: the README.md claims that yapgvb is only needed to generate
the diagrams, but not having it installed causes kgenframeworksapidocs to
fail with an ImportError (it imports depdiagram, which imports yapgvb).
You need to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115459/#review49135
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115459/
---
(Updated Feb. 6, 2014, 2:22 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115481/
---
(Updated Feb. 6, 2014, 3:40 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115481/#review49138
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115520/#review49145
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alex Merry
On Feb. 6, 2014, 4:41
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115520/
---
(Updated Feb. 6, 2014, 5:41 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115520/#review49146
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Thursday 06 February 2014 07:23:30 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Thursday 06 February 2014 01:15:15 David Faure wrote:
Some issues left:
- who do we write down as maintainer for attica?
Good question, let's mark it TBD until someone dares to step up for it.
That said, obviously, if there's
On Thursday 06 February 2014 07:23:30 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Thursday 06 February 2014 01:15:15 David Faure wrote:
Some issues left:
- who do we write down as maintainer for attica?
Good question, let's mark it TBD until someone dares to step up for it.
That said, obviously, if there's
I have packaged up KF5 alpha 1 and uploaded it for packagers.
Can we consider KF5 frozen all of tomorrow (Friday 7) ?
This way if there's any showstopper bugfix I can redo the tarballs without
bringing in unrelated changes which might create other problems.
Sorry for the productivity loss :-)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115524/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcompletion
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115524/
---
(Updated Feb. 6, 2014, 10:35 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115525/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcompletion
Description
On February 6, 2014 12:12:18 PM Alex Merry wrote:
On 06/02/14 07:38, Matthew Dawson wrote:
I'll do my best to watch over the frameworks, but I'm not sure how much
I'll be able to push them forward in the near future. At the very least
I'll keep an eye on any review requests that come in on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115526/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcompletion
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115525/#review49161
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Feb. 6,
Hey,
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:30 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
I have packaged up KF5 alpha 1 and uploaded it for packagers.
Can we consider KF5 frozen all of tomorrow (Friday 7) ?
I have quite some extensive changes for KNotifications (basically merging
KNotify daemon to
Hello,
On Friday 07 February 2014 06:25:46 Martin Klapetek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:30 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
I have packaged up KF5 alpha 1 and uploaded it for packagers.
Can we consider KF5 frozen all of tomorrow (Friday 7) ?
I have quite some extensive changes
42 matches
Mail list logo
