On Wednesday 04 February 2015 09:33:00 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
Ok, I've changed knewstuff to a solution type. Should all frameworks that
depend on kio be also changed to solution type ?
Sounds right.
--
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE Frameworks 5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122360/#review75588
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On Feb. 1, 2015, 12:11
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122360/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2015, 1:19 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Wednesday 04 February 2015 19:54:36 Maximiliano Curia wrote:
Hi,
As part of the packaging efforts in Debian we are testing the installed
headers to check that they compile correctly and have all their dependencies
installed.
Nice :-)
Testing kross we found this:
// static metaobject
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122478/#review75600
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Edmundson
On Feb. 8, 2015, 1:11
See http://build.kde.org/job/kross_master_qt5/86/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122478/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kconfigwidgets
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122445/#review75594
---
src/core/kdesktopfile.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122459/#review75596
---
Ship it!
I don't know this code very well, but the reasoning
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122482/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kconfigwidgets
On Sunday 08 February 2015 18:18:48 Aleix Pol wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
Hey all,
In trying to get kf5 built on an older machine with clang 3.7 I've hit an
isuse with kdeclarative. A few days ago some code was checked into it that
That page was the result of the first discussion we had on C++11.
More recently, there was a discussion on raising MSVC requirement.
And, I'd say it was agreed to raise it to MSVC11 (VS12). At least, it
was green-lighted by Kevin, Milian (I don't recall who else).
I guess I should have updated
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122481/
---
Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X, KDE Frameworks, David Faure,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122481/#review75613
---
src/widgets/kurlcompletion.cpp
Hey all,
In trying to get kf5 built on an older machine with clang 3.7 I've hit an
isuse with kdeclarative. A few days ago some code was checked into it that
uses std::lround which isn't available on clang's stdlib implementation
yet. Should this change to floor or ciel, or is there an #ifdef we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122482/#review75617
---
src/kcmodule.cpp
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Jeremy Whiting jpwhit...@kde.org wrote:
Hey all,
In trying to get kf5 built on an older machine with clang 3.7 I've hit an
isuse with kdeclarative. A few days ago some code was checked into it that
uses std::lround which isn't available on clang's stdlib
On Nov. 27, 2014, 7:29 a.m., Christoph Cullmann wrote:
I actually would prefer no such hack in the public headers.
If that is just to make porting easier, you can use that locally as a patch
until the kdevplatform code is cleaned up.
Milian Wolff wrote:
I still don't get why you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121263/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2015, 2:42 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
See http://build.kde.org/job/kross_master_qt5/87/changes
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120442/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2015, 2:55 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122484/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcodecs
Description
Yeah it's using the newest xcode for is x 10.7 so the libc++ is probably
older, Qt supports 10.7 though so maybe we shouldn't be using these newer
c++11 methods in frameworks just yet right?
On Feb 8, 2015 2:04 PM, Ivan Čukić ivan.cu...@kde.org wrote:
thought this was clang 3.7 maybe I'm
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122481/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2015, 3:06 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122487/#review75629
---
Ship it!
Which magic tool did you come up with this time, to
https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/lang/llvm-3.7/Portfile I
thought this was clang 3.7 maybe I'm confused though
On Feb 8, 2015 1:39 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Diumenge, 8 de febrer de 2015, a les 09:55:05, Jeremy Whiting va
escriure:
Hey all,
In trying to
thought this was clang 3.7 maybe I'm confused though
This is (should not) be a problem with the compiler version - this is
a library function. Which version of libc++ is it using? (it might be
using the old system's one instead of the latest release or something)
Cheerio,
Ivan
On 8 February
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122487/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcoreaddons
Description
El Diumenge, 8 de febrer de 2015, a les 09:55:05, Jeremy Whiting va escriure:
Hey all,
In trying to get kf5 built on an older machine with clang 3.7 I've hit an
isuse with kdeclarative.
clang 2.7 or 3.7?
3.7 is still unreleased, no?
Cheers,
Albert
A few days ago some code was checked
Qt supports 10.7 though so maybe we shouldn't be using these
newer c++11 methods in frameworks just yet right?
As seen on the 'policies' page, we are not tied to all the platforms
that are supported by Qt.
This was decided in the thread named Supported Compilers / C++11
Support in KF5, started
On Feb. 8, 2015, 5:44 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
src/widgets/kurlcompletion.cpp, line 836
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122481/diff/1/?file=347903#file347903line836
Qt5 has Q_OS_OSX to target OS X rather than a Mac OS (which according
to Qt includes iOS).
For
On feb. 7, 2015, 7:14 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
Using two spaces is called sentence spacing and most probably done by
intention, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentence_spacing
So this is a matter of taste, and should not be changed especially in the
licensing headers. KDE
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122462/
---
(Updated feb. 8, 2015, 10:46 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122493/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Marco Martin.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122481/#review75645
---
Why not port to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122493/#review75648
---
-1
You use C-Style casts. Oke, the frameworks coding style
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122481/#review75661
---
Ship it!
Nice!
- David Faure
On Feb. 9, 2015, 3:24 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122495/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Friedrich W. H. Kossebau.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122493/#review75646
---
`qRound`?
- Kevin Funk
On Feb. 8, 2015, 11:12 p.m., Jeremy
On Feb. 8, 2015, 9:45 p.m., David Faure wrote:
Which magic tool did you come up with this time, to detect such things? :-)
+1 :D I too want to know!
- Aleix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122481/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2015, 8:24 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks,
On February 5, 2015 08:49:16 PM Marco Martin wrote:
Hi all,
I was investigating this bug..
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id43583
but after digging and digging, it looks like more and more an issue in
KConfig..
basically if there is a config file in a system-wide location (to give
42 matches
Mail list logo
