On May 5, 2015, 9:08 p.m., Marko Käning wrote:
Looks like the test is still failing:
https://build.kde.org/job/kcoreaddons%20master%20kf5-qt5/24/PLATFORM=OSX,compiler=clang/testReport/(root)/TestSuite/kusertest/
Anything I could do?
Yes, you could try applying the patch :)
This
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123654/#review79958
---
generally +1 from my side except for the open question for
Hi Christian,
I think that the stuff you're looking for (reducing version churn) can also
be provided by having stable branches for selected parts of KF5.
IMHO this can be quite an elegant solution given the usual cat-herding
problem of FLOSS where people just do what they want to do. Those
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123632/
---
(Updated May 6, 2015, 1:19 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122680/
---
(Updated May 6, 2015, 1:19 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123626/
---
(Updated May 6, 2015, 2:35 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
On May 4, 2015, 10:36 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Sorry, that's not enough you need to add the loader to the sources, see
CMakeLists.txt of the daemon.
And maybe you want to share your new acquired knowldge in the wiki?
Martin Klapetek wrote:
Ah ok, update incoming.
I've
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123595/#review79976
---
I'm not sure, after reading
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123626/#review7
---
Ship it!
I've read and tested it, everything still works
On May 6, 2015, 5:38 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
I would keep this for safety until Plasma 5.4 is released, then try to
remove it again
First, sorry for being the bad cop, i'd just like to avoid any future
(irreversible) problems, and that distros delivering monthly KF5 updates
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123669/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Alex Richardson and David Faure.
On May 6, 2015, 10:54 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
I've read and tested it, everything still works nicely. Good job!
I like how the patch moves much of the query language into simple C++,
avoids a lot of query parsing and moves some of the error paths to compile
time.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123669/#review80001
---
+1 seems sensible.
autotests/kpluginloadertest.cpp (line
Please help me help you,
I do not have lists containing who needs / wants what and where.. I tried my
best to make some educated guesses. I do not take rejection well and so
I ask anyone that wishes to have your CI builds in email or IRC please tell
me the rpoject and places you want them to
On May 6, 2015, 5:38 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
I would keep this for safety until Plasma 5.4 is released, then try to
remove it again
First, sorry for being the bad cop, i'd just like to avoid any future
(irreversible) problems, and that distros delivering monthly KF5 updates
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123626/
---
(Updated May 6, 2015, 5:21 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123626/#review79977
---
I would keep this for safety until Plasma 5.4 is released,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123626/
---
(Updated May 6, 2015, 5:20 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks and
18 matches
Mail list logo
