---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124795/
---
(Updated Aug. 17, 2015, 9:58 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
On Aug. 15, 2015, 9:24 p.m., David Faure wrote:
Why not use KService instead?
Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
I don't know :) Seemed like the most reasonable way given I was checking
the Desktop file for the exec path already.
KService is in Tier 3, KConfig is in Tier 1.
- Aleix
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Kevin Funk kf...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday 16 August 2015 11:19:39 Alex Merry wrote:
On 2015-08-13 09:57, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
Hi,
My experience with MSVC 2013 was that you even need at least Update 4
for initializer lists to work properly, which
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124772/#review83935
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Aug. 16, 2015,
Hi,
Qt accepts 2012 at least doesn't it? I see KF5 following this a good thing.
From my perspective of supporting 3rd party devs:
Dependency on 2012 in practice can exist for many reasons, preference and
taste often being the last ones.
If the goal is to have maximum reach for KF5 possible, using
GENERAL INFO
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kio%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/68/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:59:01 +
Build duration: 14 min
CHANGE SET
Revision 5ccd6db89c8a58a91fc40111c0c4a6a6da8649f6 by
GENERAL INFO
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kio%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/68/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:59:01 +
Build duration: 14 min
CHANGE SET
Revision 5ccd6db89c8a58a91fc40111c0c4a6a6da8649f6 by
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124788/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124789/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: bluez-qt
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124772/#review83945
---
Ship it!
+1
src/services/kservicegroup.cpp (line 711)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124789/#review83950
---
Ship it!
Thanks. I will commit it for you.
- David Rosca
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124795/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
Repository: kio
On Aug. 17, 2015, 3:51 p.m., David Rosca wrote:
Thanks. I will commit it for you.
David Rosca wrote:
But I need your full name.
Armin K. wrote:
I've used Armin K. all the time I've been online and nobody has
complained when using it in git commits. I don't feel comfortable
On Aug. 17, 2015, 3:51 p.m., David Rosca wrote:
Thanks. I will commit it for you.
But I need your full name.
- David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
On Aug. 17, 2015, 3:51 p.m., David Rosca wrote:
Thanks. I will commit it for you.
David Rosca wrote:
But I need your full name.
I've used Armin K. all the time I've been online and nobody has complained when
using it in git commits. I don't feel comfortable in revealing my last
Is it really necessary to assert here:
krita(3310)/(default) unknown: ASSERT failure in
KServiceTypeFactory::KServiceTypeFactory(): Could not open sycoca
database, you must run kbuildsycoca first!, file
/home/boud/kf5/src/frameworks/kservice/src/services/kservicetypefactory.cpp,
line 38
On Monday 17 August 2015 09:37:52 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Is it really necessary to assert here:
krita(3310)/(default) unknown: ASSERT failure in
KServiceTypeFactory::KServiceTypeFactory(): Could not open sycoca
database, you must run kbuildsycoca first!, file
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, David Faure wrote:
On Monday 17 August 2015 09:37:52 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Is it really necessary to assert here:
krita(3310)/(default) unknown: ASSERT failure in
KServiceTypeFactory::KServiceTypeFactory(): Could not open sycoca
database, you must run kbuildsycoca
On Monday 17 August 2015 10:05:05 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
This assert isn't triggered from our own code, but from kio's previewjob
Ah OK.
and either kdelibs4 didn't have the assert, or kio didn't need the
cache.
I'm pretty sure that both of these statements are wrong.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124772/
---
(Updated Aug. 17, 2015, 9:16 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124795/#review83964
---
Ship it!
Good solution!
Clearly kmail's folder tree needs
On Sunday 16 August 2015 11:19:39 Alex Merry wrote:
On 2015-08-13 09:57, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
Hi,
My experience with MSVC 2013 was that you even need at least Update 4
for initializer lists to work properly, which was released quite
recently iirc.
And even then, initializer lists
On Sunday 16 August 2015 23:36:33 Luigi Toscano wrote:
David Faure ha scritto:
On Sunday 16 August 2015 13:51:29 Michael Pyne wrote:
There's no reason even with our current build metadata that we'd *have* to
have project hierarchies, as long as each underlying git repository name
23 matches
Mail list logo
