Re: Review Request 128680: [KCharSelect] Add ToolButton for disabling characters not available in selected font

2016-09-12 Thread Christoph Feck
> On Sept. 4, 2016, 4:34 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote: > > Andreas, any idea which icon the action could use? > > Andreas Kainz wrote: > I would use visibility and hint to show/hide the font's that are not > available in the selected font. will the font change to "not selected" grayed > out

Jenkins-kde-ci: kio master kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 213 - Fixed!

2016-09-12 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD SUCCESS Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kio%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/213/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:06:25 + Build duration: 16 min CHANGE SET Revision ee81ab8cf039e55d6c759fc828f89efdbc2b726a by

Jenkins-kde-ci: kio master kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 213 - Fixed!

2016-09-12 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD SUCCESS Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kio%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/213/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:06:25 + Build duration: 16 min CHANGE SET Revision ee81ab8cf039e55d6c759fc828f89efdbc2b726a by

Re: Taking over maintainership of Baloo

2016-09-12 Thread Christoph Cullmann
Hi, after looking a bit more at the code, I think there are ATM a lot of things that need fixing: 1) 32-bit system: I see no fix, > 1GB of index and baloo + all baloo using applications fail see bugs like https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356114 here we have the 5GB limit, which is now

Jenkins-kde-ci: kio master kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 212 - Unstable!

2016-09-12 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kio%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/212/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:26:44 + Build duration: 8 min 7 sec CHANGE SET Revision 1f0daf852ea70a461e35644b0fa3ad3fee10e8c0

Re: Review Request 128895: Return high-resolution line edit clear icon

2016-09-12 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
> On Sept. 12, 2016, 2:15 nachm., Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: > > I am confused because I cannot reproduce the problem described in > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128630/ in the first place, this without > > the patch > > Changed the "small icon size" to 22, and dolphin still shows an

Re: Review Request 128895: Return high-resolution line edit clear icon

2016-09-12 Thread Hugo Pereira Da Costa
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128895/#review99125 --- I am confused because I cannot reproduce the problem

Review Request 128895: Return high-resolution line edit clear icon

2016-09-12 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128895/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, Plasma and Hugo Pereira Da Costa.

Re: C++11 & friends

2016-09-12 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 12 September 2016 at 09:10, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > On 12 September 2016 at 08:04, Kevin Funk wrote: > >> On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into

Re: C++11 & friends

2016-09-12 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 12 September 2016 at 08:04, Kevin Funk wrote: > On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the > > comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr. > > > >

Re: C++11 & friends

2016-09-12 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Sunday, September 11, 2016 3:21:21 AM CEST Dominik Haumann wrote: > Hi all, > > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the > comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr. > > While this change is trivial for obvious reasons, do we really need to do >

Re: C++11 & friends

2016-09-12 Thread Kevin Funk
On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote: > Hi all, > > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the > comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr. > > While this change is trivial for obvious reasons, do we really need to do > that?