On Sunday 24 November 2013 21:36:02 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> >> Tiers above 1 are not especially relevant. A tier is a fluid label. It
> >> doesn't matter when we are using split repos.
> >
> > If you could stop spreading that it'd be nice. It's not because you see no
> > value
Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> Tiers above 1 are not especially relevant. A tier is a fluid label. It
>> doesn't matter when we are using split repos.
>
> If you could stop spreading that it'd be nice. It's not because you see no
> value in tier 2 and 3 distinction that this value doesn't exist.
I think
Hello,
On Tuesday 19 November 2013 22:59:15 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> John Layt wrote:
> > It was agreed that the ideal plan for kdepimlibs was to split all the
> > libraries up and make them all stand-alone Frameworks, aiming for Tier
> > 2 or even Tier 1 where possible.
>
> Tiers above 1 are not es
On 19 November 2013 22:59, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> John Layt wrote:
> Those TODO tasks are very 'vertical'. Many tasks, and most useful tasks in
> frameworks porting, are horizontal. The horizontal tasks should largely be
> done before the vertical ones. Horizontal tasks are things like:
>
> * Po
On 19 November 2013 22:59, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> John Layt wrote:
> Those TODO tasks are very 'vertical'. Many tasks, and most useful tasks in
> frameworks porting, are horizontal. The horizontal tasks should largely be
> done before the vertical ones. Horizontal tasks are things like:
>
> * Po
