On Tuesday 04 March 2014 12:08:07 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dissabte, 1 de març de 2014, a les 16:53:28, David Faure va escriure:
On Saturday 01 March 2014 16:39:56 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Every time someone commits to
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:30 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 04 March 2014 12:08:07 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dissabte, 1 de març de 2014, a les 16:53:28, David Faure va escriure:
On Saturday 01 March 2014
El Dimarts, 4 de març de 2014, a les 21:34:12, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:30 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 04 March 2014 12:08:07 Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dissabte, 1 de març de
On Friday 28 February 2014 20:49:34 Ben Cooksley wrote:
I suggest that any further BC or SC changes be rolled out more
carefully, with pushes being separated by sufficient time for the CI
system to complete builds of earlier modules.
I just tried to do that, with the KF5 version number
On Saturday 01 March 2014 16:03:52 David Faure wrote:
So yeah, it's doable, but quite painful. I wish we could script this, but
wait for CI is hard to script...
Oh, and if one doesn't have the rights for Build Now on build.kde.org, one
cannot fix things after messing up the push order.
El Dissabte, 1 de març de 2014, a les 16:06:24, David Faure va escriure:
On Saturday 01 March 2014 16:03:52 David Faure wrote:
So yeah, it's doable, but quite painful. I wish we could script this, but
wait for CI is hard to script...
Oh, and if one doesn't have the rights for Build Now on
On Saturday 01 March 2014 16:39:56 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Every time someone commits to okular, which may a bit too much, no?
This is not what I suggested.
I suggested: if A and B are both marked as dirty because a commit was just
pushed to them, then look at whether one depends on the
El Dissabte, 1 de març de 2014, a les 16:53:28, David Faure va escriure:
On Saturday 01 March 2014 16:39:56 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Every time someone commits to okular, which may a bit too much, no?
This is not what I suggested.
I suggested: if A and B are both marked as dirty because a
Hi all,
As there still seem to be remnants of the last BIC change to
Frameworks around i've now commenced a force rebuild of all Frameworks
on the CI system.
Apologies in advance for any noise this creates - but it is necessary
for this to be fixed to allow for other Frameworks dependent
