Re: C++11 & friends

2016-09-13 Thread Kevin Funk
On Monday, 12 September 2016 09:10:46 CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 12 September 2016 at 08:04, Kevin Funk wrote: > > On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with

Re: C++11 & friends

2016-09-12 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 12 September 2016 at 09:10, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > On 12 September 2016 at 08:04, Kevin Funk wrote: > >> On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into

Re: C++11 & friends

2016-09-12 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 12 September 2016 at 08:04, Kevin Funk wrote: > On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the > > comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr. > > > >

Re: C++11 & friends

2016-09-12 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Sunday, September 11, 2016 3:21:21 AM CEST Dominik Haumann wrote: > Hi all, > > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the > comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr. > > While this change is trivial for obvious reasons, do we really need to do >

Re: C++11 & friends

2016-09-12 Thread Kevin Funk
On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote: > Hi all, > > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the > comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr. > > While this change is trivial for obvious reasons, do we really need to do > that?

C++11 & friends

2016-09-10 Thread Dominik Haumann
Hi all, I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr. While this change is trivial for obvious reasons, do we really need to do that? I am raising this question especially since KTextEditor seems to use 'nullptr'