On Monday, 12 September 2016 09:10:46 CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 12 September 2016 at 08:04, Kevin Funk wrote:
> > On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with
On 12 September 2016 at 09:10, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>
>
> On 12 September 2016 at 08:04, Kevin Funk wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into
On 12 September 2016 at 08:04, Kevin Funk wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the
> > comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr.
> >
> >
On Sunday, September 11, 2016 3:21:21 AM CEST Dominik Haumann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the
> comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr.
>
> While this change is trivial for obvious reasons, do we really need to do
>
On Sunday, 11 September 2016 03:21:21 CEST Dominik Haumann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the
> comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr.
>
> While this change is trivial for obvious reasons, do we really need to do
> that?
Hi all,
I just saw a commit by Volker turning nullptr into Q_NULLPTR with the
comment that Visual Studio 2012 does not support nullptr.
While this change is trivial for obvious reasons, do we really need to do that?
I am raising this question especially since KTextEditor seems to use
'nullptr'