D12919: [Plotter] Don't render if m_node is null

2018-05-17 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit R296:9d7c4927e506: [Plotter] Dont render if m_node is null (authored by broulik). REPOSITORY R296 KDeclarative CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://phabricator.kde.org/D12919?vs=34261=34356 REVISION

D12919: [Plotter] Don't render if m_node is null

2018-05-17 Thread David Edmundson
davidedmundson accepted this revision. davidedmundson added a comment. I think it makes sense in the following situation: a remove window event is queued a render event is queued we'll have set node to null, and called disconnect, but we'll still be processing pending events.

D12919: [Plotter] Don't render if m_node is null

2018-05-16 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
broulik added a comment. > Do you know if that bug reporter had 2617a2ab9d472a78559f11ee8d430d951e3335f2 applied? Given it said Frameworks 5.46 I would assume so REPOSITORY R296 KDeclarative REVISION DETAIL

D12919: [Plotter] Don't render if m_node is null

2018-05-16 Thread David Edmundson
davidedmundson added a comment. Have you seen 2617a2ab9d472a78559f11ee8d430d951e3335f2 The point we set m_node to null we disconnect the connection that calls render. Do you know if that bug reporter had

D12919: [Plotter] Don't render if m_node is null

2018-05-16 Thread Bhushan Shah
bshah accepted this revision. bshah added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Sounds good to me. REPOSITORY R296 KDeclarative REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D12919 To: broulik, #plasma, bshah Cc: bshah, kde-frameworks-devel, michaelh, ngraham, bruns

D12919: [Plotter] Don't render if m_node is null

2018-05-16 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
broulik created this revision. broulik added a reviewer: Plasma. Restricted Application added a project: Frameworks. Restricted Application added a subscriber: kde-frameworks-devel. broulik requested review of this revision. REVISION SUMMARY `m_node` is deleted when window changes, we would