Harald Sitter wrote:
> I am actually not sure how we handle this for ECM. CCing Stephen
> Kelly who I think is semi-maintaining ECM right now.
Hi,
Thanks for the heads-up.
I'm afraid I'm way out of the loop. I don't know what appstream or /metainfo
are. However, let's see if I can contribute.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2016-04-22 12:45 GMT+02:00 Harald Sitter :
>> Lost mailing list CC, I am assuming that was intentional? (:
>
> Oops, no - I didn't see the CC and didn't hit reply-all then...
> Adding the list back
2016-04-22 12:45 GMT+02:00 Harald Sitter :
> Lost mailing list CC, I am assuming that was intentional? (:
Oops, no - I didn't see the CC and didn't hit reply-all then...
Adding the list back (hope your reply isn't private ;-) ), the mail I
sent first is below.
> On Thu, Apr 21,
Il giorno Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:26:54 +0200
Harald Sitter ha scritto:
> doesn't that break compatibility with older appstreams for everything
> that uses ECM? if so, I am not sure that is appropriate TBH
I noticed that as well (at the same time when we were standardizing
the
ahoy ahoy!
http://commits.kde.org/extra-cmake-modules/4b7a90bfe7a3e2eb3ae83c946c182a79fabc51e3
doesn't that break compatibility with older appstreams for everything
that uses ECM? if so, I am not sure that is appropriate TBH
HS
___