On 02/02/2014 04:54 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
On 02/02/14 07:27, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 02/02/2014 12:45 AM, Alex Merry wrote:
The obvious thing to do is set a package property (or something
equivalent) that says it was found as a dependency. The danger there is
that if something is first found
On 02/02/14 16:10, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 02/02/2014 04:54 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
Either that,
or have it as a completly orthogonal property that nevertheless
interacts with TYPE, but I think that's overcomplicating matters.
It is not clear to me whether you realize that that is what I
On 02/02/2014 05:26 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
On 02/02/14 16:10, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 02/02/2014 04:54 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
Either that,
or have it as a completly orthogonal property that nevertheless
interacts with TYPE, but I think that's overcomplicating matters.
It is not clear to me
On 02/02/14 16:36, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 02/02/2014 05:26 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
On 02/02/14 16:10, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 02/02/2014 04:54 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
Either that,
or have it as a completly orthogonal property that nevertheless
interacts with TYPE, but I think that's
On 02/01/2014 08:22 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
(CC'ing Stephen because this is relevant to the version of
find_dependency in CMake master)
Currently, the find_dependency() macro does not pass the QUIET argument
to find_package unless the parent package was being found quietly. This
means that
On 01/02/14 20:21, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 02/01/2014 08:22 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
So, I think that find_dependency should pass QUIET to find_package
whether or not the parent package is being found quietly.
Do other people agree?
I agree with the problem statement, but not the solution
On 02/02/2014 12:45 AM, Alex Merry wrote:
On 01/02/14 20:21, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 02/01/2014 08:22 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
So, I think that find_dependency should pass QUIET to find_package
whether or not the parent package is being found quietly.
Do other people agree?
I agree with the
