On Friday 27 December 2013 19:54:14 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
On Friday 27 December 2013 19:00:14 Aleix Pol wrote:
Hi,
I've been going through the kde4support forward includes, since I wanted
to
start making the modules I decided we'd better make sure all of them are
working properly
Hi,
I've been going through the kde4support forward includes, since I wanted to
start making the modules I decided we'd better make sure all of them are
working properly.
After some research, I found that I don't have these available, can
somebody please tell me if I'm missing some dependency
On Friday 27 December 2013 19:00:14 Aleix Pol wrote:
Hi,
I've been going through the kde4support forward includes, since I wanted to
start making the modules I decided we'd better make sure all of them are
working properly.
After some research, I found that I don't have these available, can
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
Hello,
On Friday 18 October 2013 20:24:00 Aleix Pol wrote:
I realized recently that we have a weird setup for those CamelCased
includes that now we keep in kdelibs/includes, so I was guessing that
probably we want to
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Ivan Čukić ivan.cu...@kde.org wrote:
The above is pretty much it on my side, but I'd like to add something:
We should get those forwarding includes generated to not have to maintain
Lets bring this topic back from the dead.
I don't have a real preference
The above is pretty much it on my side, but I'd like to add something:
We should get those forwarding includes generated to not have to maintain
Lets bring this topic back from the dead.
I don't have a real preference between include/Module, include/KDE/Module and
include/KF5/Module.
Main
Hi,
I realized recently that we have a weird setup for those CamelCased
includes that now we keep in kdelibs/includes, so I was guessing that
probably we want to split them and move them into each directory.
Also we should decide if we want to keep them in KDE/ or in a KModule/
directory and
