On 2013-07-10, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> OK thanks for the clarification. I don't know where I got that impressi=
> on that=20
> QtScript and Qml were using the same JS engine then...
it was that way in qt4 :)
/Sune
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
K
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 13:30:17 Chusslove Illich wrote:
> > [: Kevin Ottens :]
> > For locale it should be QLocale really. KLocale is likely to disappear at
> > some point. QLocale might not fulfill all your needs yet, but we'd need to
> > know what you miss sooner than later.
>
> I don't have
> [: Kevin Ottens :]
> [ki18n not being tier 1] Means the set of frameworks which will use ki18n
> will be reduced though. Maybe not a big deal, our needs for advanced i18n
> features are likely not as high there than in applications (I'm unsure
> about that statement honestly).
I'm not terribly c
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 10:05:33 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:01:15AM +0200, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 July 2013 23:18:59 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > > Note that QtScript can't be loaded in a plugin, so using it in
> > > KTranscript
> > >
> > > relies on that c
Hello,
On Tuesday 02 July 2013 22:06:20 Chusslove Illich wrote:
> > [: Kevin Ottens :]
> > Note that apparently there's no interest from the maintainer in making
> > ki18n tier1 (ktranscript plugin being part of it and depending on kjs)...
> > Which would make KIO tier3. You might want either to d
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:01:15AM +0200, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 July 2013 23:18:59 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > Note that QtScript can't be loaded in a plugin, so using it in KTranscript
> > relies on that changing anyway:
> >
> > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38193
>
> Is it
On Tuesday 02 July 2013 23:18:59 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Note that QtScript can't be loaded in a plugin, so using it in KTranscript
> relies on that changing anyway:
>
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38193
Is it still true with Qt5? I thought they switched away from JavaScriptCore to
u
Le mardi 2 juillet 2013 21:35:13 Mark a écrit :
> ** ahh, so we're continuing in this message after all instead of "KIO
> progress towards tier 1 framework? (resend)". **
No, this was a reply to your message on k-f-d. I just removed the "resend" in
my reply, it
> [: Stephen Kelly :]
> As far as I understand, the ki18n library does not depend on a javascript
> engine, but only the separate ktranscript plugin does?
It is not really separate, it is in plugin form only as an internal
optimization detail (languages which don't use it don't pay the memory/
sta
Chusslove Illich wrote:
>> [: Kevin Ottens :]
>> Note that apparently there's no interest from the maintainer in making
>> ki18n tier1 (ktranscript plugin being part of it and depending on kjs)...
>> Which would make KIO tier3. You might want either to discuss with
>> Chusslove or consider using t
> [: Kevin Ottens :]
> Note that apparently there's no interest from the maintainer in making
> ki18n tier1 (ktranscript plugin being part of it and depending on kjs)...
> Which would make KIO tier3. You might want either to discuss with
> Chusslove or consider using tr() I'm afraid.
In the case o
** ahh, so we're continuing in this message after all instead of "KIO
progress towards tier 1 framework? (resend)". **
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:06 PM, David Faure wrote:
> Le mardi 2 juillet 2013 13:49:01 Mark a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> When i'm looking in
On Tuesday 02 July 2013 14:06:37 David Faure wrote:
> KIO can't be tier1 though: kio core depends on kcoreaddons (for KJob), on
> KConfig and on ki18n.
> (and on kservice for some strange default-user-agent feature, maybe we can
> change that)
>
> That makes it tier2 if we can remove the kservic
Le mardi 2 juillet 2013 13:49:01 Mark a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> When i'm looking in the kdelibs splitting document [1] i only see KIO
> pop up twice. One to get kbookmarks out of KIO (which is work in
> progress). Another one with "kio-core" as work in progress.
Right.
> But i can't find any documenta
Hi,
When i'm looking in the kdelibs splitting document [1] i only see KIO
pop up twice. One to get kbookmarks out of KIO (which is work in
progress). Another one with "kio-core" as work in progress.
But i can't find any documentation anywhere that gives me a clear view
as to how far KIO is on it'
I suspect a lot of people read both, but it's probably better to keep
frameworks discussions on the frameworks list as much as possible.
Forwarding there now.
Alex
Original Message
Subject: Re: KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:05:25 +0200
16 matches
Mail list logo
