Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-15 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 14 October 2013 17:38:42 John Layt wrote: On 14 October 2013 12:55, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: Giving it a closer look, I'm wondering: are you sure about this course of action? KDateTimeEdit is basically a KDateComboBox and a KTimeComboBox layouted together. So

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-14 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday 03 October 2013 18:15:22 John Layt wrote: KDateTimeEdit - My new widget to replace many local widgets, added in last kdelibs release - Can replace KDateComboBox, KTimeComboBox, api is almost the same - Not used anywhere!?! - API uses QDate, QTime, KDateTime,

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-14 Thread John Layt
On 14 October 2013 12:55, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: Giving it a closer look, I'm wondering: are you sure about this course of action? KDateTimeEdit is basically a KDateComboBox and a KTimeComboBox layouted together. So deprecating those two without deprecating KDateTimeEdit sounds

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-14 Thread John Layt
On 14 October 2013 12:55, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: Giving it a closer look, I'm wondering: are you sure about this course of action? KDateTimeEdit is basically a KDateComboBox and a KTimeComboBox layouted together. So deprecating those two without deprecating KDateTimeEdit sounds

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-07 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Thursday 03 October 2013 18:15:22 John Layt wrote: On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-10-03 Thread John Layt
On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if they're worth switching to, if not before then at Qt

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-27 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 25 September 2013 11:28:54 John Layt wrote: On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-27 Thread John Layt
On 25 September 2013 17:21, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote: snip I've been talking to the QML component guys and they will have a new calendar component for 5.3 that they need QCalendarSystem for as well. /snip Hi John, What you said there sounds very interesting to me! Do you have any

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-27 Thread John Layt
On 27 September 2013 16:52, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: On Wednesday 25 September 2013 11:28:54 John Layt wrote: Started to look at the number of uses, but lxr hardly shows any. Does lxr include .ui files, or do I need to grep? I don't think it does unfortunately. No, doesn't appear

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-25 Thread John Layt
On 24 September 2013 19:24, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if they're worth switching to, if not before then at Qt

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-25 Thread Mark
snip I've been talking to the QML component guys and they will have a new calendar component for 5.3 that they need QCalendarSystem for as well. /snip Hi John, What you said there sounds very interesting to me! Do you have any link for me where i can read about that or where current code in

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-24 Thread John Layt
On 24 September 2013 12:11, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: OK, let's attempt to move KLocale, KDateTime and friends to kde4support now. With some luck we'll be able to completely get rid of KDE4Attic before release. Hmm, looking at that closer... indeed it looks like we can get rid of

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-24 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 19:03:21 John Layt wrote: I'll do some analysis on the use of all the widgets and what ones are worth keeping, and look at the Qt widgets to see if they're worth switching to, if not before then at Qt Dev Days / Qt Contributors Day. OK, I'll ignore this part of

QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-23 Thread John Layt
Hi, I am extremely relived to announce that QTimeZone finally got merged late late last night, thanks to the efforts of Thiago in fighting the CI system :-) Combined with other changes in QDateTime, this should mean we're free of KDateTime and KTimeZone, albeit with a few caveats. I'll be doing

Re: QTimeZone merged for 5.2

2013-09-23 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 23 September 2013 09:06:33 John Layt wrote: Hi, I am extremely relived to announce that QTimeZone finally got merged late late last night, thanks to the efforts of Thiago in fighting the CI system :-) Combined with other changes in QDateTime, this should mean we're free of